Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tehran's Unfriendly Skies
military.com ^ | April 11, 2006 | John Weisman

Posted on 04/11/2006 4:38:52 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

A group of well financed Islamo-fascist terrorists buy current models of American-built jets, paint them to look like passenger or cargo aircraft, then fly suicide missions against targets in the West.

That sounds like the plot of one of my novels. But according to a well-placed source of mine, it's exactly what the Iranian government has been trying to do for more than a year now. Commercial aircraft brokers on at least two continents have received shadowy inquiries they believe originate in Tehran to buy eight-year-old or younger B737 new generation airplanes, and B747-400 aircraft of the same vintage, price no object.

The fact that Iran may be trying to buy American made jet aircraft clandestinely and is willing to pay sky's-the-limit prices is hugely worrisome. According to Joshua R. Edkins [pseudonym], a retired supergrade CIA clandestine service operative, “Buying aircraft is very competitive and the first question usually asked is, ‘How much.?' When price doesn't matter, something's wrong. Such is the case here. If Iran buys these aircraft, what better way to deliver a nuke?”

Edkins and others with knowledge of the Tehran regime believe that it would be operationally feasible for Iran to buy an aircraft, fit it with a primitive nuclear device, and launch the plane against an American target. The suicide crew might be Iranian, or the mission could be jobbed out to one of Iran's owned-and-operated Shia surrogates like Hezbollah, or even sub-contracted to a Sunni al-Qa'ida or al-Qa'ida in Iraq cell.

“They'll train a crew and insert a Plutonium bomb using dated Fat-Boy technology -- which is why they need a fat belly aircraft,” says Edkins.

Indeed, flight training could be conducted in Iran. The pilots could conceivably become proficient enough to fly Iran Air flights in order to learn commercial procedures and develop confidence dealing with air control centers.

Operationally, a mission against the US would be incredibly tough -- but not impossible. And the Iranians have both patience and a long-term weltanschauung when it comes to these sorts of terror operations. You want weltanschauung? Long before the Ayatollah Khomeini came to power, the nucleus of what would become his Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was training in Lebanon's Beka'a Valley under the protection of the PLO's Yasser Arafat. So by the time Arafat and his minions left Beirut for Tunis in 1982, Iran had already established itself to fill the terror vacuum in Lebanon by creating what would become Hezbollah and the Islamic Jihad Organization. And patience? After the 1979 seizure of the American Embassy, hundreds of pages of shredded CIA documents were painstakingly reconstructed strand by strand.

So now, Tehran can take its time too. The Iranians can spend weeks, even months monitoring and recording communications between commercial aircraft and regional FAA control centers or even NORAD by using scanners, thus familiarizing the suicide crew with what they'd have to say as they approached U.S. airspace. The same techniques could be used to glean language from flight control in Western Europe.

The airliners could go through a series of identity changes that would make them nigh on impossible to trace. And when it came time to use them, they wouldn't have to be painted to look like jets belonging to United Airlines or other U.S.-based carriers, either. Any airline that flies 737s or 747s would do -- even FedEx or other airfreight carriers. The list of false IDs would also probably also include aircraft from South America, where Iran is currently deepening its ties with such anti-US leaders as Venezuela's rabidly anti-American president Hugo Chavez.

Indeed, the growing Tehran-Caracas axis is troubling on a number of levels. When I was in Paris recently, a source of mine with well-placed intelligence connections in Tehran mentioned that as far back as early 2005 the mullahs had budgeted more than $200 million to spread around in South America, where a growing number of the continent's new leaders, epitomized by Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, are turning both leftward and increasingly anti-US in their policies.

Venezuelan president Chavez is a vocal supporter of Iran's nuclear program. As far back as March of 2005, the then-president of Iran, Mohammad Khatami, received a warm welcome from the Venezuelan strongman. Khatami did not visit Chavez empty-handed either. He delivered 100,000 AK-47 assault rifles (an impressive number of weapons considering the fact that the Venezuelan armed forces number only slightly more than 80,000) as well as a cadre of Iranian experts -- several hundred “engineers” and “technicians” to help set up joint commercial ventures. Those joint ventures also provide perfect cover for status for clandestine officers from Iran's intelligence service, the Ministry of Security and Information, thus allowing Iran's Seppah-e Pasdaran (the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps), to establish a fertile and hospitable hub from which to recruit agents, gather intelligence, and organize terror operations against the United States.

Chavez and the new Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have also exchanged warm greetings in recent months. Ahmadinejad, who has called for the eradication of Israel and claimed the Holocaust never took place, is said to have been impressed by Chavez's 2005 Christmas Eve broadcast, during which the Venezuelan made a number of anti-Semitic remarks.

And how does the current Caracas-Tehran love-fest dovetail with Iran's attempts to buy American aircraft and fly one at a U.S. target? The answer is that the Venezuelan president might actually be loony enough to be persuaded to allow Tehran to substitute its suicide mission for a Venezuelan flight. Fiction? Like I said, it sounds like the plot of one of my novels. But stranger things have actually happened.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; redjihad

1 posted on 04/11/2006 4:38:53 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

All the paint in the world won't mask their radar signature or profile. I am not an expert on identifying aircraft; but there is no way I could confuse a Canadian Regional Jet with a F-15.


2 posted on 04/11/2006 4:50:05 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I suppose most of what Weisman says is possible but most anything is possible. I would be curious to know if he is working on another novel.
3 posted on 04/11/2006 4:52:01 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Yeah, but could you differentiate between an Air Venezuela B373-800 and a B737-800F painted in Air Venezuela colors at two miles?
4 posted on 04/11/2006 5:10:17 PM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Coupled with the previous article about Iran wanting direct flights to the US...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565476/posts

What do you have?


5 posted on 04/11/2006 5:16:31 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Thats the point of buying commerical airplanes. They'd just fly the plane into our airspace and then detonate over our cities. How would US air traffic controllers know if there are passengers or a nuke on a plane?
6 posted on 04/11/2006 5:20:41 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

If I lived in DC, I'd move.


7 posted on 04/11/2006 5:26:07 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It takes quite a bit more than a paint job to make a jetliner appear legitimate. A properly electronically-identified substitution flight from, say, Caracas, that ended up depositing a nuke on an American city would be treated as the act of war it most certainly would be and Caracas would cease to exist. Tehran would as well. There is no way they would not be found out and the damage they'd do to the U.S. would be a candle compared to the firestorm that would come in reply.
8 posted on 04/11/2006 5:28:06 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Don't US ATC's have schedules of foreign commercial aircraft entering US airspace? They would know origins and airlines.

Also, wouldn't the aircraft have to squawk a legitimate IFF signal that would coincide with the schedule?

Terrorists could try to imitate a commercial aircraft already scheduled to enter US airspace, but wouldn't it be funny to an ATC if he had 2 Flying Carpet Airlines, flight 666 aircraft on his radar display?

Oh well, if they ever dropped ONE Fatboy on us, I hope we could prove who did it and absolutely vaporize them.
9 posted on 04/11/2006 5:45:33 PM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

I just started reading Col. North's book and loading nukes on passenger jets against the US is part of the plot in this book.

10 posted on 04/11/2006 5:50:23 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I was FReepin' when FReepin' wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

we are going to keep riding all diplomatic avenues, until Iran has a nuke and can blackmail Europe and the US then we will try to find some middle ground and negotiate with this terrorist leader of Iran. We won't dare attack them when they have a nuke, because a couple or even one being launched can hit European city's, american bases, or israel.


11 posted on 04/11/2006 6:30:22 PM PDT by Btrp113Cav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
candle...firestorm

Yep. If Caracas or Tehran did that to us, we'd own those countries' oil output for the next two centuries to help defray expenses.

HF

12 posted on 04/11/2006 10:45:10 PM PDT by holden (holden on'a'na truth, de whole truth, 'n nuttin' but de truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Btrp113Cav

"we are going to keep riding all diplomatic avenues, until Iran has a nuke and can blackmail Europe and the US then we will try to find some middle ground and negotiate with this terrorist leader of Iran. We won't dare attack them when they have a nuke, because a couple or even one being launched can hit European city's, american bases, or israel."

We're too busy caving on to illegal aliens to do anything about Iran.

How effing pathetic.


13 posted on 04/12/2006 1:27:28 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
This is a very good plan! If a regularly scheduled flight is delayed from take off and the Iranian plane is substituted with the right transponder code and correct flight path this plan will definitely work!
14 posted on 04/12/2006 6:08:32 AM PDT by 2001convSVT ("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369
Thats the point of buying commerical airplanes. They'd just fly the plane into our airspace and then detonate over our cities. How would US air traffic controllers know if there are passengers or a nuke on a plane?

Well for starters, commercial jets must file flight plans and most all are on regular schedules. Before taking off they must have permission to land at whatever US destination airport they intend to land. How many times have you had to sit on a runway awaiting clearance to take off because of some issue at the airport you intend to land?

The only way this could work would be to substitute the aircraft for a regular scheduled flight and that would be quite difficult. You just don’t approach the US out of the blue with no flight schedule. Alarms would be going off the entire way as local and regional flight controllers struggle to keep legitimate traffic clear of the aircraft that has no reason to be there and they have no idea where it is going.

15 posted on 04/12/2006 10:22:33 AM PDT by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

bttt


16 posted on 04/13/2006 12:39:44 PM PDT by dennisw (If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles-Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
alt
17 posted on 04/14/2006 10:48:17 AM PDT by dennisw (If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles-Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson