Two hundred years? Your version of history suddenly shrinks, as if the world did not know how to conduct science until Charles Darwin arrived on the scene. In general, science has been undertaken with the assumption the obsevable universe is intelligible, and as such is quite possibly a product of intelligent design. This assumption has little or no effect on the general conduct of science. To see you and your ilk jump like frogs at the suggestion intelligent design might be behind it all only serves as a clear indicator you are not really interested in science per se, but in defending a personal ideology that may have little or no bearing on objective reality.
I'm sorry, Fester, but science is a closed shop, and you don't have the key.