"Who exactly is this "Scientific Community" of which you speak?"
That's one of those things you really know the answer to before you try to change the scientific community - much as you should study the government or the church before you try to run them.
Very profound, but, none the less, meaningless and simply a dodge on your part. There is no such thing as the "scientific community" there are associations, clubs, mailing lists, credentials, titles ect, but there is no ruling body, constitutions or elections that have end all, say all.
Science can be discovered or invented by anyone. It is elitism that is the greatest danger to science not ID or anything else. Most of what you would like to think of as the "Science Community" is big business with all the good and bad that comes along with it.
The biggest problem I see with evolution is that it is way to restrictive. My view of the universe is that it's infinite and it all has purpose and opportunity. The evo view of the world is meaningless, randomness and most of what is around us is a mistake. Now which view do you think promotes science?