Very profound, but, none the less, meaningless and simply a dodge on your part. There is no such thing as the "scientific community" there are associations, clubs, mailing lists, credentials, titles ect, but there is no ruling body, constitutions or elections that have end all, say all.
Science can be discovered or invented by anyone. It is elitism that is the greatest danger to science not ID or anything else. Most of what you would like to think of as the "Science Community" is big business with all the good and bad that comes along with it.
The biggest problem I see with evolution is that it is way to restrictive. My view of the universe is that it's infinite and it all has purpose and opportunity. The evo view of the world is meaningless, randomness and most of what is around us is a mistake. Now which view do you think promotes science?
Oddly inconsistent with your statement that it has no ruling bodies and can be done by anybody. The problem with your complaint is that the critics of evolution have had hundreds of years to do some science, and have not done any. This is their evaluation of the situation, not mine. This is the position of the Discovery Institute.