Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

But what puzzles me is President Bush also spoke and said he had to finally admit there were no WMD in Iraq.


Link?


122 posted on 04/09/2006 5:03:19 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: angcat
I said: "But what puzzles me is President Bush also spoke and said he had to finally admit there were no WMD in Iraq (or something like that)."

From This Link: Bush Will Watch What He Says in Second Term

"The White House acknowledged Wednesday that there is no longer an active search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The final report from chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, due out next month, has concluded that "the former regime had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD."

The Bush administration does not hold out hopes that any weapons will ever be found.

"I felt like we'd find weapons of mass destruction — like many here in the United States, many around the world. The United Nations thought he had weapons of mass destruction," Bush told Walters. "So, therefore: one, we need to find out what went wrong in the intelligence gathering.Saddam was dangerous and the world is safer without him in power."

To me that statement shows he conceded to ALL THE REPORTS (The UN Report,(Kay) and the US Report,(Duelfer) that there were no WMD.

125 posted on 04/09/2006 10:32:30 AM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson