[CyberAnt]

The drive-by media is at it again!

[marron]

If the president discloses classified information, its a bad thing. If the New York Times does it, its a good thing.

[p23185]

The drive-by media is at it again!

Can we just please, I beg you drive by media, just start the impeachment and let's get this thing behind us!!!! I am sick and tired of listening to these looney liberals and their hatred of GWB. There will be nothing found that will support impeachment and I want them make fools of themselves all over this issue. They will never forget the impeachment of THEIR PRESIDENT for having sex in Oval Office . . . ./sarcasm

[Echo Talon]

FACT: The President And The Vice President Have The Authority To Declassify Information:

FACT: On July 18, 2003, The NIE Was Formally Declassified Asserting "Compelling Evidence" Saddam Hussein Was "Intent On Acquiring" WMDs:

FACT: Valerie Plame's Name Does Not Even Appear In The Declassified NIE:

FACT: According To Media Reports, There Is No Indication The President Or Vice President Authorized Disclosing The Identity Of Valerie Plame:

FACT: In 2002 And 2003, Dems Repeatedly Called For Declassifying More Data About Iraq:

Easier to see this way... :)

[nopardons]

bttt

[thomaswest]

Consider Matthew 6: "Use not vain repetions, For they hope they shall be heard for their much speaking; it profits them not."

[napscoordinator]

The drive-by media is at it again!



I keep hearing that the only reason they are against the President is to get back at the Republicans for impeaching the President for giving a BJ in the White House (I know there is more to it than that but I am only giving media impressions). I don't understand why the dems would think that way because aren't they the ones who got Nixon and we supposedly used Clinton to get back at the dems. Now isn't it even and this impeachment stuff should be done. It could be a never ending circle if it is not stopped now. I have always been convinced that if they do get President Bush in 2007 and censure or impeach, then I truly believe that EVERY President from here on out will be at least censured for something. This has got to stop before it is too late.

[Kimberly GG]

HI....I would like to use this information, but am having trouble finding it, as you posted it, on the RNC site. Do you have a direct link? TIA

[Phsstpok]

I think everyone, including the White House and RNC, are missing a big component of this. The dims and their lapdogs in the dinosaur media are surely taking a shot at Bush with this and getting the news cycle to spin away from Cynthia McKinney, but they're also setting up a defense for Rockefeller when it comes out that he leaked the super secret details of 3 "black" programs that he was briefed on, including the NSA Al Qaeda intercept program.

"Yeah, he leaked it, but so what? They all do it! And Bush did it for crass political purposes of trying to discredit a fine upstanding whistleblower by endangering his CIA agent wife! Rockefeller did it because he had to stop the abuse of the Constitution by this DangerouslyIncompetent^TM administration."

 

"Yeah, that's the ticket."

[jdhljc169]

Bump

[WOSG]

Ah, Sen Dick Durbin (D-Hypocrite) ...

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL): "It's troubling to have classified information that contradicts statements made by the administration ... There's more they should share with the public." (Frank Davies, "Democrats Urge Focus On Terror Instead Of Iraq," The Philadelphia Inquirer, 10/5/02)

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL): "[T]hey were disclosing secret classified information from the national intelligence estimate to the press in hopes of bolstering the President's popularity. It is a grave disappointment." (Sen. Dick Durbin, Congressional Record, p. S3186, 4/6/06)

[Just mythoughts]

Doesn't this whole mess boil down to somebody within our government was trying to protect Saddam. Joe Wilson was "selected" to produce the "INTEL" that would make the case that Saddam wasn't nearly as bad as the world thought.

[lowbridge]

bump