Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oh man. This is just lovely.
1 posted on 04/06/2006 9:12:17 AM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: rwfromkansas
There was no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized Libby to disclose Plame's CIA identity.

Someone needs to inform the Bush haters at The Smoking Gun...

Libby: Bush Authorized Plamegate Leak

2 posted on 04/06/2006 9:14:02 AM PDT by weegee ("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...

WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide told prosecutors President Bush authorized the leak of sensitive intelligence information about Iraq, according to court papers filed by prosecutors in the CIA leak case.

Before his indictment, I. Lewis Libby testified to the grand jury investigating the Valerie Plame leak that Cheney told him to pass on the information and that it was Bush who authorized the leak, the court papers say. According to the documents, the authorization led to the July 8, 2003, conversation between Libby and New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

There was no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized Libby to disclose Plame's CIA identity.

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

4 posted on 04/06/2006 9:15:52 AM PDT by nutmeg (NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Will this non-story never end?


6 posted on 04/06/2006 9:17:29 AM PDT by RockinRight (Yes...she's an excellent tour guide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

This was not even a 'leak', it was a legal release of information. The President is authorized to do that.


7 posted on 04/06/2006 9:17:38 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Did anyone see CNN? The anchor on the show just said that Bush gave out Plame's name as the CIA agent, which is wrong!


9 posted on 04/06/2006 9:18:22 AM PDT by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
.

Pete Yost is used by Dem sources to release "secret" information in a way to make it sound like something else.

13 posted on 04/06/2006 9:19:20 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Too bad the papers don't say what it is that President Bush authorized to be leaked.

What if it was just a routine press release?


15 posted on 04/06/2006 9:22:33 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
Depending as usual on the naivete of the American Public and the MSM, AP fails to mention that all classification and declassification authority derives solely and absolutely from the President Of The United States, not from some nitwit cabal of Beltway reporters, bureaucratic leakers, and K Street lawyers.

By definition, when the President authorizes any change in classification, his order trumps any other person, position, or institution. The President cannot "leak" or delegate "leaking" to his subordinates.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12958: CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION

Sec. 1.4. Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President;

(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President in the Federal Register; or

(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c), below.

16 posted on 04/06/2006 9:22:40 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Stick a fork in somebody cause something smells done.


17 posted on 04/06/2006 9:23:25 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (If I wanted to live in Mexico, I'd FRIGGING MOVE THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

As if we will ever know the truth...


18 posted on 04/06/2006 9:23:26 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Bush hates leaks.
This has got to be totally twisted.
You can bet the general MSM-watching public will never learn the truth, though.


19 posted on 04/06/2006 9:24:13 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com ...Crime shouldn't pay: support LEGAL immigration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

This will leave a mark.


20 posted on 04/06/2006 9:26:40 AM PDT by Blackirish (Hillary is angry AND brittle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas; All

UPDATE:

DAVID ENSOR OF CNN SAYS THIS IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT.

He quoted from the document in question.

What it states is that Libby claims VP Cheney told him the president okayed some of the info from the intelligence estimate being released. That is what was authorized by the president according to Libby.

NOT the name release at all.


22 posted on 04/06/2006 9:28:14 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

What information?


23 posted on 04/06/2006 9:29:12 AM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Even Scooter Libby and Tom Delay are fed up with the RINO position on amnesty!
25 posted on 04/06/2006 9:30:00 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (How could an illegal be a "guest" of anything? What part of criminal don't RINO's understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
Leak of what - Plame. LoL! Psssst. she's was as classified as a box of rocks.
31 posted on 04/06/2006 9:32:08 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Well, isn't this charming.


35 posted on 04/06/2006 9:33:13 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

I bet DU is just foaming with commies right now. None of whom have actually read the documents posted on the SG.


36 posted on 04/06/2006 9:33:25 AM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
Do "those people" understand the problem with this line of reasoning? If Bush "leaked" the information, then it's not a leak; it's "declassification". As the POTUS, he gets to do stuff like that. And, according to one executive order, Cheney also gets to declassify material as he sees fit. The last time I looked, it's not a crime for the POTUS or VPOTUS to declassify information. And not crime means no Merry Fitzmas.
43 posted on 04/06/2006 9:38:03 AM PDT by Redcloak (WARNING: This post may irritate John McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas; areafiftyone
See my post #10 on another thread. A 25 page "Key Judgments" document based on the NIE was released in Oct 2002. That means portions of the NIE were declassified well before July 2003.
45 posted on 04/06/2006 9:39:04 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson