Oh man. This is just lovely.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: rwfromkansas
There was no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized Libby to disclose Plame's CIA identity. Someone needs to inform the Bush haters at The Smoking Gun...
Libby: Bush Authorized Plamegate Leak
2 posted on
04/06/2006 9:14:02 AM PDT by
weegee
("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney's former top aide told prosecutors President Bush authorized the leak of sensitive intelligence information about Iraq, according to court papers filed by prosecutors in the CIA leak case.
Before his indictment, I. Lewis Libby testified to the grand jury investigating the Valerie Plame leak that Cheney told him to pass on the information and that it was Bush who authorized the leak, the court papers say. According to the documents, the authorization led to the July 8, 2003, conversation between Libby and New York Times reporter Judith Miller.
There was no indication in the filing that either Bush or Cheney authorized Libby to disclose Plame's CIA identity.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
4 posted on
04/06/2006 9:15:52 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
To: rwfromkansas
Will this non-story never end?
6 posted on
04/06/2006 9:17:29 AM PDT by
RockinRight
(Yes...she's an excellent tour guide!)
To: rwfromkansas
This was not even a 'leak', it was a legal release of information. The President is authorized to do that.
To: rwfromkansas
Did anyone see CNN? The anchor on the show just said that Bush gave out Plame's name as the CIA agent, which is wrong!
9 posted on
04/06/2006 9:18:22 AM PDT by
ruschpa
To: rwfromkansas
.
Pete Yost is used by Dem sources to release "secret" information in a way to make it sound like something else.
13 posted on
04/06/2006 9:19:20 AM PDT by
mrsmith
To: rwfromkansas
Too bad the papers don't say what it is that President Bush authorized to be leaked.
What if it was just a routine press release?
To: rwfromkansas
Depending as usual on the naivete of the American Public and the MSM, AP fails to mention that
all classification and declassification authority derives solely and absolutely from the President Of The United States, not from some nitwit cabal of Beltway reporters, bureaucratic leakers, and K Street lawyers.
By definition, when the President authorizes any change in classification, his order trumps any other person, position, or institution. The President cannot "leak" or delegate "leaking" to his subordinates.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12958: CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION
Sec. 1.4. Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:
(1) the President;
(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President in the Federal Register; or
(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c), below.
16 posted on
04/06/2006 9:22:40 AM PDT by
angkor
To: rwfromkansas
Stick a fork in somebody cause something smells done.
17 posted on
04/06/2006 9:23:25 AM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(If I wanted to live in Mexico, I'd FRIGGING MOVE THERE!)
To: rwfromkansas
As if we will ever know the truth...
18 posted on
04/06/2006 9:23:26 AM PDT by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: rwfromkansas
Bush hates leaks.
This has got to be totally twisted.
You can bet the general MSM-watching public will never learn the truth, though.
19 posted on
04/06/2006 9:24:13 AM PDT by
visualops
(www.visualops.com ...Crime shouldn't pay: support LEGAL immigration...)
To: rwfromkansas
20 posted on
04/06/2006 9:26:40 AM PDT by
Blackirish
(Hillary is angry AND brittle.)
To: rwfromkansas; All
UPDATE:
DAVID ENSOR OF CNN SAYS THIS IS COMPLETELY INCORRECT.
He quoted from the document in question.
What it states is that Libby claims VP Cheney told him the president okayed some of the info from the intelligence estimate being released. That is what was authorized by the president according to Libby.
NOT the name release at all.
22 posted on
04/06/2006 9:28:14 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
To: rwfromkansas
To: All
Even Scooter Libby and Tom Delay are fed up with the RINO position on amnesty!
25 posted on
04/06/2006 9:30:00 AM PDT by
68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
(How could an illegal be a "guest" of anything? What part of criminal don't RINO's understand?)
To: rwfromkansas
Leak of what - Plame. LoL! Psssst. she's was as classified as a box of rocks.
To: rwfromkansas
Well, isn't this charming.
35 posted on
04/06/2006 9:33:13 AM PDT by
hershey
To: rwfromkansas
I bet DU is just foaming with commies right now. None of whom have actually read the documents posted on the SG.
36 posted on
04/06/2006 9:33:25 AM PDT by
jw777
To: rwfromkansas
Do "those people" understand the problem with this line of reasoning? If Bush "leaked" the information, then it's not a leak; it's "declassification". As the POTUS, he gets to do stuff like that. And, according to one executive order, Cheney also gets to declassify material as he sees fit. The last time I looked, it's not a crime for the POTUS or VPOTUS to declassify information. And not crime means no Merry Fitzmas.
43 posted on
04/06/2006 9:38:03 AM PDT by
Redcloak
(WARNING: This post may irritate John McCain.)
To: rwfromkansas; areafiftyone
See my post
#10 on another thread. A 25 page "Key Judgments" document based on the NIE was released in Oct 2002. That means portions of the NIE were declassified well before July 2003.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson