Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIRCUMCISION: Did you know?
The Daily Barometer ^ | Today | Daniel Cullen

Posted on 04/05/2006 5:19:29 PM PDT by Giant Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 581 next last
To: Mr. Lucky

I don't recall referring to abortion in this thread but I am definitely against it and yes, it is a far worse evil than circumcision.


421 posted on 04/07/2006 4:15:40 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
Agreed!

Anyone paying attention to these knuckle heads need their heads examined. They have NO issue with ABORTION and have NO issues with being "gay". In fact they've bought into the "gay gene" disproven theory. This group has it wrong as usual.
422 posted on 04/07/2006 4:20:07 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JABBERBONK

You need to get your facts straight, I didn't complain about rubbing, I still have a foreskin. I simply said that the fact that a circumcised male is not bothered by it means that he has lost sensation as a result of circumcision. This is a fact.

As far as children making adult decisions, I simply don't think that even a parent should be making the decision to unnecessarily remove a portion of a child's body that has no need of being removed. The mere fact that you think it is ok only indicates the shallowness of your own thinking.


423 posted on 04/07/2006 4:21:45 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Perhaps those who are circumcised just don't know what they're missing.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I can assure you that they most certainly don't and the vehemence with which some of them denounce anyone who says so makes me chuckle. As Shakespeare wrote,"methinks the gentleman doth protest too much", it serves to indicate someone who doesn't want to admit that he may have been shortchanged 8 0 )


424 posted on 04/07/2006 4:26:12 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: Giant Conservative
In fact, it is barbarism, and should be banned worldwide.

I disagree. God told the Jews to circumcise their sons. While the reason he told them to do so was as a sign of faith, I have no doubt that there are medical and physical benefits to circumcision, even if we have not discovered them yet. Many of the injunctions issued by God in the Old Testament lead toward better health.
425 posted on 04/07/2006 4:26:36 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
I enjoy sex immensely and have absolutely no desire whatsoever to have a foreskin.

The only thing I know is a friend of mine had it done at 30 years of age. He told me later he wished he had never done it. I am intact and plan on staying that way.

426 posted on 04/07/2006 4:32:04 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JABBERBONK
since I cannot remember any other male I know ever complaining about his glans rubbing against his clothes causing discomfort...maybe your cleaners are using too much starch.

LOL!

427 posted on 04/07/2006 7:08:49 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick

Thanks for the info. So far, my husband and I have not regretted our decision. My son can make the decision for himself as he gets older on whether or not to keep the foreskin.


428 posted on 04/07/2006 7:20:25 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer; JABBERBONK; Mr. Lucky
You need to get your facts straight, I didn't complain about rubbing, I still have a foreskin. I simply said that the fact that a circumcised male is not bothered by it means that he has lost sensation as a result of circumcision. This is a fact.

So if we see a guy walking down the street with an orgasmic look on his face, we can know that his foreskin has somehow retracted, and his glans are now rubbing about in his tighty whities?

429 posted on 04/07/2006 7:21:22 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

I have no problem with your decision and hope it works out for you. However, to call circumcision barbaric or refer to it as genital mutilation is moronic.

I once watched a public tv discussion on the subject. They actually had a support group of men (mainly gay) whining about their "loss". It was the most pathetic thing I have ever seen.


430 posted on 04/07/2006 8:47:18 AM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
However, to call circumcision barbaric or refer to it as genital mutilation is moronic.

How much of a girl's genitals can someone cut off before female circumcision becomes barbaric?

Some forms of female genital cutting are less damaging than male circumcision, for example genital scarification and genital piercing. Is scarifying or piercing a girl's labia an acceptable cultural or religious practice or is it genital mutilation?

Sunna circumcision of girls is similar to male circumcision. Sunna circumcision cuts off the hood of a girl's clitoris. Is cutting off the hood of a girl's clitoris or cutting off her labia minora an acceptable cultural or religious practice or is it genital mutilation?

Why should there be a different ethical standard for cutting the genitals of girls and cutting the genitals of boys?

431 posted on 04/07/2006 10:10:28 AM PDT by TDunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Diego1618
You got it.....and in this case, as much for the ladies health as well.

If someone proposed cutting off parts of girls' genitals in order to protect men from sexually transmitted diseases, most people would be outraged.

432 posted on 04/07/2006 10:51:12 AM PDT by TDunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: TDunn

Anything that is less damaging than circumcision is not damaging at all.


433 posted on 04/07/2006 11:08:36 AM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

No, it won't be an orgasmic look, that is the whole point of what I have been saying, in a case like that the man would be very uncomfortable and would probably be looking for a private place to rearrange himself. Try rubbing dry cloth on your wife's clitoris and ask her how she likes it. If you can still move after she finishes with you you might have some idea of what I am saying.


434 posted on 04/07/2006 1:07:10 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Hey, you have made a believer out of me. I'm gonna go back and slap the Sh*t out of that ob-gyn that robbed me of all that pleasure and pain.


435 posted on 04/07/2006 1:18:28 PM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (More people died in Ted Kennedy's car than hunting with Dick Cheney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Anyone paying attention to these knuckle heads need their heads examined. They have NO issue with ABORTION and have NO issues with being "gay".

You are misinformed. People opposed to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys do not all agree about abortion, homosexuality, or any other issue.

Some opponents of non-therapeutic circumcision are strongly pro-life and some are strongly pro-choice. Like most Americans, most opponents of non-therapeutic circumcision have a point of view on abortion somewhere in between the two extremes.

Opponents of non-therapeutic circumcision of boys also have varing attitudes regarding homosexuality.

436 posted on 04/07/2006 1:22:50 PM PDT by TDunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
Anything that is less damaging than circumcision is not damaging at all.

Are you in favor of changing state and federal laws against female genial cutting in order to allow parents to scarify their daughter's labia or to cut off the hood of their daughter's clitoris?

437 posted on 04/07/2006 1:23:53 PM PDT by TDunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

He robbed you of a lot of pleasure, probably not much pain, but I don't expect to actually convince you, you have too much at stake to face up to the facts. The truth is you can never actually know of what you have been robbed because it can never be restored to you.


438 posted on 04/07/2006 1:24:01 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Acceptance of irrational thinking is expanding exponentiallly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Giant Conservative

Outlawing circumsion would greatly diminish the industry that uses foreskins to make wallets that can expand to steamer trunks.


439 posted on 04/07/2006 1:28:33 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Giant Conservative

I was hoping to get my flap re-attached. Are there doctors that provide this service?


440 posted on 04/07/2006 1:35:16 PM PDT by Crooked Constituent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 581 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson