Posted on 04/04/2006 10:40:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
With a brilliant idea and equations based on Einsteins relativity theories, Ronald Mallett from the University of Connecticut has devised an experiment to observe a time traveling neutron in a circulating light beam. While his team still needs funding for the project, Mallett calculates that the possibility of time travel using this method could be verified within a decade.
Black holes, wormholes, and cosmic strings each of these phenomena has been proposed as a method for time travel, but none seem feasible, for (at least) one major reason. Although theoretically they could distort space-time, they all require an unthinkably gigantic amount of mass.
Mallett, a U Conn Physics Professor for 30 years, considered an alternative to these time travel methods based on Einsteins famous relativity equation: E=mc2.
Einstein showed that mass and energy are the same thing, said Mallett, who published his first research on time travel in 2000 in Physics Letters. The time machine weve designed uses light in the form of circulating lasers to warp or loop time instead of using massive objects.
To determine if time loops exist, Mallett is designing a desktop-sized device that will test his time-warping theory. By arranging mirrors, Mallett can make a circulating light beam which should warp surrounding space. Because some subatomic particles have extremely short lifetimes, Mallett hopes that he will observe these particles to exist for a longer time than expected when placed in the vicinity of the circulating light beam. A longer lifetime means that the particles must have flowed through a time loop into the future.
Say you have a cup of coffee and a spoon, Mallett explained to PhysOrg.com. The coffee is empty space, and the spoon is the circulating light beam. When you stir the coffee with the spoon, the coffee or the empty space gets twisted. Suppose you drop a sugar cube in the coffee. If empty space were twisting, youd be able to detect it by observing a subatomic particle moving around in the space.
And according to Einstein, whenever you do something to space, you also affect time. Twisting space causes time to be twisted, meaning you could theoretically walk through time as you walk through space.
As physicists, our experiments deal with subatomic particles, said Mallett. How soon humans will be able to time travel depends largely on the success of these experiments, which will take the better part of a decade. And depending on breakthroughs, technology, and funding, I believe that human time travel could happen this century.
Step back a minute (sorry, only figuratively). How do we know that time is not merely a human invention, and that manipulating it just doesnt make sense?
What is time? That is a very, very difficult question, said Mallett. Time is a way of separating events from each other. Even without thinking about time, we can see that things change, seasons change, people change. The fact that the world changes is an intrinsic feature of the physical world, and time is independent of whether or not we have a name for it.
To physicists, time is whats measured by clocks. Using this definition, we can manipulate time by changing the rate of clocks, which changes the rate at which events occur. Einstein showed that time is affected by motion, and his theories have been demonstrated experimentally by comparing time on an atomic clock that has traveled around the earth on a jet. Its slower than a clock on earth.
Although the jet-flying clock regained its normal pace when it landed, it never caught up with earth clocks which means that we have a time traveler from the past among us already, even though it thinks its in the future.
Some people show concern over time traveling, although Mallett an advocate of the Parallel Universes theory assures us that time machines will not present any danger.
The Grandfather Paradox [where you go back in time and kill your grandfather] is not an issue, said Mallett. In a sense, time travel means that youre traveling both in time and into other universes. If you go back into the past, youll go into another universe. As soon as you arrive at the past, youre making a choice and therell be a split. Our universe will not be affected by what you do in your visit to the past.
In light of this causal safety, its kind of ironic that what prompted Mallett as a child to investigate time travel was a desire to change the past in hopes of a different future. When he was 10 years old, his father died of a heart attack at age 33. After reading The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, Mallett was determined to find a way to go back and warn his father about the dangers of smoking.
This personal element fueled Malletts perseverance to study science, master Einsteins equations, and build a professional career with many high notes. Since the 70s, his research has included quantum gravity, relativistic cosmology and gauge theories, and he plans to publish a popular science/memoir book this November 2006. With help from Bruce Henderson, the New York Times best-selling author, the book will be called Time Traveler: A Physicists Quest For The Ultimate Breakthrough.
bttt
How fast? See below link:
http://woodside.blogs.com/cosmologycuriosity/2006/02/earths_speed_ar.html
Oooh! I saw that episode of Star Trek The Next Generation. Warf keeps changing uniforms and winds up married to Deanna Troy. It was one of my favorites.
But for the Onion link, I would have thought that was a real article.
My Dad told me the same thing when I was a kid (I think I was wishing for Christmas to come sooner). I didn't believe him then. I know now, he was correct! Smart man.
susie
THAT would be interesting! Well, maybe not since we wouldn't have time to even think about whether it is interesting or not. I guess we would effectively be "dead" since all body processes would cease.
And when you are standing in line for the toilet, a minute is an hour.
ping
What if he went back to Israel in say, 30 AD?
I'm sure it's already been said; but I can say it if I want to.
IF time travel were possible, we would have already met those people from that time of invention who traveled back to our time or earlier.
Yes, but this would be an ever-increasing event--one would think. How could everyone continue to keep the secret?
your right, but get back to me in a few years when the United States is part of the "one world" of all open borders...
You're welcome! Have fun watching!
Or perhaps our time is considered too dangerous, being so near the nuclear war, whose date has been narrowed to 1990 to 2025, but the exact date remains unclear.
Yes, but only in another universe.
You travel back to an ALTERNATE version of here.
You change one time stream, settle the matter, but do nothing for us here.
Basically, exit ramp only, no on-ramp.
So... no brokeback time travelers??
precisely my point. A time traveler needs to predict where we were, or will be, spacially in order to arrive on the same planet and not empty space at the terminus of their travel.
200
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.