Posted on 04/04/2006 10:40:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
With a brilliant idea and equations based on Einsteins relativity theories, Ronald Mallett from the University of Connecticut has devised an experiment to observe a time traveling neutron in a circulating light beam. While his team still needs funding for the project, Mallett calculates that the possibility of time travel using this method could be verified within a decade.
Black holes, wormholes, and cosmic strings each of these phenomena has been proposed as a method for time travel, but none seem feasible, for (at least) one major reason. Although theoretically they could distort space-time, they all require an unthinkably gigantic amount of mass.
Mallett, a U Conn Physics Professor for 30 years, considered an alternative to these time travel methods based on Einsteins famous relativity equation: E=mc2.
Einstein showed that mass and energy are the same thing, said Mallett, who published his first research on time travel in 2000 in Physics Letters. The time machine weve designed uses light in the form of circulating lasers to warp or loop time instead of using massive objects.
To determine if time loops exist, Mallett is designing a desktop-sized device that will test his time-warping theory. By arranging mirrors, Mallett can make a circulating light beam which should warp surrounding space. Because some subatomic particles have extremely short lifetimes, Mallett hopes that he will observe these particles to exist for a longer time than expected when placed in the vicinity of the circulating light beam. A longer lifetime means that the particles must have flowed through a time loop into the future.
Say you have a cup of coffee and a spoon, Mallett explained to PhysOrg.com. The coffee is empty space, and the spoon is the circulating light beam. When you stir the coffee with the spoon, the coffee or the empty space gets twisted. Suppose you drop a sugar cube in the coffee. If empty space were twisting, youd be able to detect it by observing a subatomic particle moving around in the space.
And according to Einstein, whenever you do something to space, you also affect time. Twisting space causes time to be twisted, meaning you could theoretically walk through time as you walk through space.
As physicists, our experiments deal with subatomic particles, said Mallett. How soon humans will be able to time travel depends largely on the success of these experiments, which will take the better part of a decade. And depending on breakthroughs, technology, and funding, I believe that human time travel could happen this century.
Step back a minute (sorry, only figuratively). How do we know that time is not merely a human invention, and that manipulating it just doesnt make sense?
What is time? That is a very, very difficult question, said Mallett. Time is a way of separating events from each other. Even without thinking about time, we can see that things change, seasons change, people change. The fact that the world changes is an intrinsic feature of the physical world, and time is independent of whether or not we have a name for it.
To physicists, time is whats measured by clocks. Using this definition, we can manipulate time by changing the rate of clocks, which changes the rate at which events occur. Einstein showed that time is affected by motion, and his theories have been demonstrated experimentally by comparing time on an atomic clock that has traveled around the earth on a jet. Its slower than a clock on earth.
Although the jet-flying clock regained its normal pace when it landed, it never caught up with earth clocks which means that we have a time traveler from the past among us already, even though it thinks its in the future.
Some people show concern over time traveling, although Mallett an advocate of the Parallel Universes theory assures us that time machines will not present any danger.
The Grandfather Paradox [where you go back in time and kill your grandfather] is not an issue, said Mallett. In a sense, time travel means that youre traveling both in time and into other universes. If you go back into the past, youll go into another universe. As soon as you arrive at the past, youre making a choice and therell be a split. Our universe will not be affected by what you do in your visit to the past.
In light of this causal safety, its kind of ironic that what prompted Mallett as a child to investigate time travel was a desire to change the past in hopes of a different future. When he was 10 years old, his father died of a heart attack at age 33. After reading The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, Mallett was determined to find a way to go back and warn his father about the dangers of smoking.
This personal element fueled Malletts perseverance to study science, master Einsteins equations, and build a professional career with many high notes. Since the 70s, his research has included quantum gravity, relativistic cosmology and gauge theories, and he plans to publish a popular science/memoir book this November 2006. With help from Bruce Henderson, the New York Times best-selling author, the book will be called Time Traveler: A Physicists Quest For The Ultimate Breakthrough.
I have already seen the future. You don't want to go there.
I think the first thing I'd like to do is travel back in time and introduce antibiotics or warn of planned violent attacks on Americans.
Travel to the future is consistent with known laws, has been demonstrated by experiment, and although it has no easily foreseeable practical implementation, it can be done.
Going backwards involves so many paradoxes, I rather doubt that it is possible at all.
Maybe somebody from the future beat you to it. ;-)
"ATTN! Present TD? This is Future TD: If you had been working and
not farting around on FR, they wouldn't have fired us."
Jeepers, I gotta go . . .
I would imagine there would also have to be limits on travel in either or both directions otherwise one could scr.w themselves. [really-actually and literally]
Hehe! yeah, they did - I was thinking I'd just like the chance to preempt them and introduce them in the mid 1800's...
My wife is one. She thinks she knows everything that's going to happen. Just ask her.
We're going back in time. The Cleveland Indians win the 1948 World Series!!
Little do you know. Have you ever bothered to think how utterly improbable your present is? How likely was it that the Soviet Union would just ... give up, without a shot being fired? That was, from the viewpoint of the decades before, the most unlikely scenario imaginable.
In truth, the actual history of that time is that Soviet Premier Igor Dorkoff (Igor the Horrible) launched a first strike, with the expected consequences. The aftermath was so ghastly that for one of the few times in history, it was decided to intervene at his conception. Now you know.
(This post will self-destruct before long.)
Either the people in the future aren't smart enough OR we manage to blow ourselves to pieces befre we figure it out. OR a new ice age comes and kills us all.
LOL!
We're keeping a low profile...
I have to confess that one of my descendents sneezed while on a tour of prebiotic earth. His mom told him to carry a hanky, but did he listen?
Decorum prevents me from describing how the bacterial flagellum got transported back to the past.
Past and future are also improbable if not totally illusory. Is memory any better than anticipation? We don't even know what happened that fateful day in Dallas over 40 years ago and probably know just as well what Dallas will be like 40 years from now.
ROFLMAO!!!
Weird, again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.