To: rocksblues
Cynthia: The idea that the security of members of Congress is contingent upon a piece of jewelry or the way they wear their hair is...ridiculous. What does that say about the kind of security that we have?
11 posted on
04/03/2006 2:20:58 PM PDT by
Sender
(As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. Be without form. -Sun Tzu)
To: Sender
Listen to her. They didn't recognize her. That's all this is about... her stupid sense of self-importance.
18 posted on
04/03/2006 2:22:45 PM PDT by
Types_with_Fist
(I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
To: Sender
She's again playing the "do you know who I am?" card. According to her, it's law enforcement's responsibility to know who she is.
20 posted on
04/03/2006 2:24:05 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: Sender
The idea that the security of members of Congress is contingent upon a piece of jewelry or the way they wear their hair is...ridiculous. That piece of jewelry is the same as an ID badge. If she's too self-important to wear it, she's too important to be in politics.
In this post 9-11 era, anyone who doesn't stop at a check point after being asked to stop three times should be tasered... after it's determined who they are.
To: mhking
For info.
Updates and quotes from McKinney are coming up periodically on this thread.
109 posted on
04/03/2006 2:58:26 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson