GovernmentZero
Posted on 04/03/2006 10:52:49 AM PDT by The_Victor
Virgin Galactic has collected $13 million in cash from some 157 people who have signed contracts to be flown to the edge of the atmosphere -- about 110 kilometers -- to experience about five minutes of low-gravity conditions, Virgin Galactic President Will Whitehorn said.
The London-based company made headlines in late 2004 when its founder, British entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson, agreed to finance development of a six-passenger SpaceShipTwo vehicle, based on the Burt Rutan-designed SpaceShipOne that successfully flew twice from the Mohave Airfield in California and thereby won the $10 million Ansari X Prize.
Sir Richard's Virgin Galactic and Rutan have completed design of SpaceShipTwo, which will operate from New Mexico following the approval of that state to develop a spaceport, including a long airstrip that will accommodate Virgin Galactic.
In a March 17 presentation to the European Space Agency and the European Center for Space Law and in a March 29 interview, Whitehorn said that nearly 18 months after the SpaceShipOne flight, Virgin Galactic remains convinced that space tourism will be a good business.
Backed by Sir Richard and Virgin Group, Virgin Galactic is investing between $200 million and $240 million to build five SpaceShipTwo vehicles, with a first flight planned in 2008 or 2009 -- a year or two later than originally planned. Passengers will be paying $200,000 each to make the flight, and will be permitted to leave their seats to experience weightlessness.
The entire flight is expected to last about two hours.
Whitehorn said the response from prospective customers has been more positive than expected. Some have deposited the full $200,000 in a Virgin Galactic account to reserve their places. Others have made a $20,000 deposit.
The Virgin Galactic business plan calls for 50,000 passengers to be flown in the company's first 10 years of operations. With that revenue stream, the company is assured of an average 25 percent annual return on invested capital, Whitehorn said.
That's for the core business. Virgin Galactic is also in preliminary talks with NASA and with the European Space Agency on business relations that could include having prospective astronauts from those agencies act as SpaceShipTwo pilots to hone their skills.
Virgin Atlantic, Branson's commercial airline, announced March 29 that the company's 700 pilots are being invited to apply for positions as Virgin Galactic pilots.
Another side business will be carrying spectators in a separate aircraft to witness SpaceShipTwo in action for lower fees.
Whitehorn said Virgin Group has set no fixed ceiling on its investment. "But I know very well that if we don't make a viable business plan, my colleagues at Virgin won't look as kindly on the investment as they would otherwise," he said.
With the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) setting regulations that permit SpaceShipTwo passengers to waive insurance and other security-related rights, Whitehorn said his company has all the legal leeway it needs. It still must protect the safety of people and property surrounding the New Mexico installation.
Whitehorn lavished praise on FAA regulators, saying the rules they have adopted for space tourism will permit the same kind of "adventure capitalism" that helped usher in the era of commercial air travel.
He said the FAA could have killed all hope for Virgin Galactic if it had insisted on full certification of SpaceShipTwo as an aircraft. "It would have cost us a billion dollars in that case," he said.
Fashioning a paper airplane from his notepad, Whitehorn tossed it into the air before his audience of lawyers. "You could build it out of paper and they would not regulate it," he said.
One set of regulations -- the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR -- eventually could stand in Virgin Galactic's way if the company sought to operate outside the United States.
Whitehorn said for now it will remain a purely U.S.-based operation.
For the business plan to work, Virgin Galactic will need to be able to accept a wide range of ages and health histories from its prospective customers. Whitehorn said health issues among passengers are the biggest areas of concern for the company -- not the design or performance of SpaceShipTwo.
"For us, the biggest risk is a medical incident in space," Whitehorn said, referring to the 110-kilometer apogee of SpaceShipTwo. "Heart and blood circulation -- those are our big issues." He said SpaceShipTwo is designed so that the passengers would survive even a catastrophic failure of the craft during flight.
Space ping.
I notice they aren't turning away government business.
I'm not sure how they arrived at that number.
I'm just relieved that the bureaucrats at the FAA decided to refrain from cutting them off at the knees with abusive regulations.
Hard to tell.
I also notice they aren't actually orbiting the Earth.
I could get 30-45 seconds of effectively zero G by taking my plane up to the edge and putting it into a dive and letting people float around in the cabin.
But hey, if people want the pay millions instead of a few thousand for fuel for same thing because it's a rocket; that's their call.
"The fix is in"
"You'll be a witness to that game of chance is the sky..."
"You know we've got to win."
The words of Donald Fagan ala 2001, FINALLY coming to pass... no thanks to "NASA".
IGY...
The FAA is the one government agency that has any say over this activity. They do appear to be sympathetic to the effort, but just wait 'till the first mishap.
Robert Goddard launched his first liquid-fuel rocket in 1926, but it took another 32 years for the Army to put a satellite into orbit.
And why should they have any say over this activity? Why should they have the authority to dicate the number of handholds and baggage stowage compartments to this business?
The FAA regulates all civilian airspace activity in the US. If it flies it has to clear FAA rules, just like any commercial aircraft.
The amount of profit the government will make from flying passengers in space perhaps?
"And why should they have any say over this activity?"
So people sitting on the Earth minding their own business don't have large explosive items falling out of the sky and killing them.
It's kind of axiomatic that our government isn't allow to do anything for it's own direct profit.
I was kinda hoping that the sign was about the total government $ spent on development.
The fact that Goddard couldn't put a satellite into orbit should tell you something about the difference between toys and real fight hardware.
Likewise, the fact that Rutan can't reach anything even close to resembling Earth Orbit, or survive the resulting atmospheric re-entry if somehow he did, should tell you something else about the difference between toys and real flight hardware.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.