Posted on 03/29/2006 3:43:18 PM PST by kellynla
If you're going to continue to break wind; we'd appreciate it if you'd go elsewhere...
you have contributed absolutely NOTHING...
do us all a favor and take your inane posts elsewhere!
Why would I address you? Remember, my opinion doesn't count according to you.
Who's we? Got a frog in your pocket?
As for my contribution, I've asked you repeatedly to justify some very dubious claims by posting a link. You obviously have ample time to shout at everyone here but no time to prove your point. I can only assume you're blowing smoke and can't prove it.
So much for not contributing. Now, go back to chewing your rug.
Yes, 100% ethanol can be used as a fuel. But even in Brazil you need to start the car on gasoline and then switch over to ethanol, since ethanol has a low vapor pressure at lower temps, and has a high heat of vaporization. Engines that can be started and run on gasoline can't be optimized for alcohol - optimizing for alcohol would typically involve raising the compression ratio significantly to take advantage of the high octane value of ethanol. Plus, burning straight ethanol as a fuel results in some rather nasty exhaust gasses - formaldehyde, for one, IIRC.
And then, of course, most places don't have the cheap labour and large tracts of rain forest that can be clear cut and sugar cane grown on (at least for a few years). And few other inputs for alcohol production can compare to sugar cane, in terms of efficiencies.
Perhaps that's the next thing, after HS.
"Count on your gas mileage to drop. Ethanol has 66% of the energy than gasoline."
But it has a high resistance to detonation, so it can be used with higher compression ratios, which increase power and efficiency, or higher levels of boost in turbocharged engines, increasing power but not efficiency.
Which is why it's ideal for racing vehicles. Not the fuel efficient vehicles needed today.
I like soybeans. I had some for dinner the other day. They were delicious.
Must be a picture of you.
Since I served in the Marine Corps in war and you served????
Let us all know when you enlist...
Aren't you tired of playing that same record over and over and over? My business card says Department of Justice. Does that entitle my opinions on Law or Justice to be more credible or important then yours?
"Texas inventor Frank Lathrop has come up with the perfect solution for the soy gas problem a seat cushion known as the "TooT TrappeR.
" Billed as a "reverse whoopee cushion," it is packed with a carbon air filter that is guaranteed to absorb odors and stop toots in their tracks.
The company also offers a panty liner made with the trademarked "Flatulence Filter."
From ... this here place
Now we simply need a pump from car seat filter to "gas" tank, a large bowl of soybeans, and off we go. ;)
And just for your knowledge I'll be on three Air Force Bases, Two National Guard Bases, and three additional Federal Facilities next week alone. You don't have to "enlist" in order to be able to serve your country moron.
Nice. It was actually "Rocket Boys". I guess they thought it didn't sound catchy enough, or maybe it sounded to science-fictiony for them. The anagram was a lucky coincidence, I guess.
Darn! So close. I don't know why I didn't think to reverse it.
>>>>"I wouldn't even think of it"<<<<
Doing you a favor.
You and Dan Rather both insult the Corps
TT
Ethanol also effectively leans out the mixture, I believe, which would contribute to detonation. Need a richer mixture, the greater % of alcohol that you're using.
Anyway, I could be confused and it's actually methanol that has a really good AKI, not ethanol. In which case that's just one more knock against ethanol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.