Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kids Build Soybean-Fueled Car(50 MPG & 0-60 MPH 4 SEC!)
CBS NEWS ^ | Feb. 17, 2006 | STAFF

Posted on 03/29/2006 3:43:18 PM PST by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-195 next last
To: kellynla

I take that as a no. Posting info without a source won't float. If you can't back it up don't post it.


121 posted on 03/30/2006 9:53:39 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: P-40

I agree completely. This guy has (hopefully) changed these kids lives forever. I say hopefully because the future is always cloudy for all of us.


122 posted on 03/30/2006 9:56:57 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Poor Baby


123 posted on 03/30/2006 9:58:25 AM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

One of the things that bothers me most about FR is that whenever something comes along that may help the energy situation, about half the posters' answer is "can't work," "won't work" or "I want a SUV that gets 8mpg so there."

IMO, this is the kind of talk that makes socialists smile as they hide behind their "progressive" label, as they point and say "see, they're just reactionary."

Maybe we ought to want an SUV that gets 30mpg and does the same thing the old one did. Maybe it'd be cool to haul the boat to the lake with an electric SUV which has 100% of its torque available at zero RPM.

IMO, if we take some corn, which we're already paying to have grown and see rot in storage, and get *some* use out of it as ethanol, this is great. Even if the equation about it taking more gas than we get out is true (which IMO it isn't, but that's another discussion) it doesn't apply; we're growing it ANYway, the cost is already present.

If we build electric cars, and then decide we need to build nuke plants to power them, great. Whatever works is great.

I guess it all depends on what your goal is in energy policy. Mine is to, as soon as possible, flip the bird to Chavez and the Saudis and Armenijihad (sp!) and all the other wackos who hold us hostage to our oil need and tell them to drink their damn oil. I know this doesn't happen in a year, or 5 years, or even 10 years, but it doesn't happen if every time we start we stop and say "never mind, this isn't THE 100% solution out of the box."

We are not Brazil; we won't replace all our need with one source. It'll take many approaches working in unison. This is also great; it means that we'll be less vulnerable to an attack on one aspect of our energy supply.

Oh, and kellynda: I don't think it's particularly helpful to keep citing that bit about one American's life, unless you actually believe that we're engaged in wars for oil.


124 posted on 03/30/2006 10:08:29 AM PST by No.6 ((www.fourthfightergroup.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite; MNJohnnie

Watch what you say to Kelly. According to him if you were not in the Military you have no right to an opinion. Now mind your Ps and Qs because he'll get real tough and add some "LOL", "LMAO", and "go away"s to his replies.


125 posted on 03/30/2006 10:18:51 AM PST by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: No.6
It'll take many approaches working in unison.

There are so many options in biofuels working right now that it is incredibly confusing and if the Average Joe only learns about one option, which is likely, then they really can't make a rational contribution to the discussion about what to do with our energy problem.
126 posted on 03/30/2006 10:19:58 AM PST by P-40 (http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
that's the city where Mayor McCheese rules with an iron skillet.

LOL!!
127 posted on 03/30/2006 10:25:27 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5

You talkin' to me boy? DROP AND GIVE ME 50!

LOL! Candy ass civilians. LMAO!


128 posted on 03/30/2006 10:29:44 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
what would Nader drive?

Probably a bicycle.

129 posted on 03/30/2006 10:31:21 AM PST by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: saganite

"Posting info without a source won't float."
I POSTED THE SOURCE, GENIUS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


I spent the better part of my free time yesterday dealing with naysaying jerks like you with absolutely NO THANKS for the post and I haven't seen one ioata of contrary links posted by you. I was going to look it up for you but after your dumb remark I'm not going to bother.
DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
http://www.eia.doe.gov


130 posted on 03/30/2006 10:31:58 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I haven't made any assertion one way or the other about oil vs corn. You did. If you're too emotional to handle someone asking for proof of your assertions maybe you shouldn't be posting here. Try MySpace.com. You might enjoy that more.


131 posted on 03/30/2006 10:40:11 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Jackknife

It takes a real dip$#!T to drive something that ugly.


132 posted on 03/30/2006 10:41:27 AM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Link?


133 posted on 03/30/2006 10:56:40 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: No.6

[I don't think it's particularly helpful to keep citing that bit about one American's life, unless you actually believe that we're engaged in wars for oil.]

I believe it.


134 posted on 03/30/2006 11:01:13 AM PST by JeffersonRepublic.com (There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5

If you're going to come on my thread and talk about me; at least have the manners to address me in your post.

Have you enlisted yet? LMAO


135 posted on 03/30/2006 11:02:27 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I see you've got time to chastise others for coming on "your post" but still no time to come up with any proof for your claims. Did you check out myspace yet? It's just right for you.


136 posted on 03/30/2006 11:05:18 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Interesting. How many acres of sugar cane are required to produce one gallon of ethanol? Is it sustainable?

I read recently that sawgrass had a similar ethanol yield to sugar cane. Too bad we don't have any of that in this country...
137 posted on 03/30/2006 11:06:07 AM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Some parents actually gave their kid the first name of Cheeseborough? What's his nickname? Cheesy?


138 posted on 03/30/2006 11:08:55 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"So you're saying that if there wasn't the huge oil deposits in the Middle East that we would have still gone to Kuwait and Iraq"

Here we go again. We import more oil from Mexico then Iraq. We import more oil from Germany then Kuwait. Have we invaded either one of those countries to get "cheap oil"? It would be a hell of a lot easier to invade Mexico or Canada (our number one supplier of imported oil) then anyone in the Middle East.

139 posted on 03/30/2006 11:09:30 AM PST by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Yeah, I caught that too (see my post above ;-).


140 posted on 03/30/2006 11:10:05 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson