To: kiriath_jearim
The owner of a property has the right to exclude weapons from his property.
However, if does this, he should be liable for criminal acts against people on his property.
81 posted on
03/29/2006 10:57:02 AM PST by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Little Ray
However, if does this, he should be liable for criminal acts against people on his property. In Virginia, at least, a property owner is almost never liable for criminal actions performed on his property by someone who is not in the employer's control.
84 posted on
03/29/2006 10:58:54 AM PST by
Potowmack
("In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." Brian Mulroney)
To: Little Ray
However, if does this, he should be liable for criminal acts against people on his property. Nonsense. Only the criminals are liable for their actions. What the employer is responsible for is taking reasonable actions to keep employees safe.
136 posted on
03/29/2006 1:24:37 PM PST by
LexBaird
("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson