Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray
However, if does this, he should be liable for criminal acts against people on his property.

In Virginia, at least, a property owner is almost never liable for criminal actions performed on his property by someone who is not in the employer's control.

84 posted on 03/29/2006 10:58:54 AM PST by Potowmack ("In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." Brian Mulroney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Potowmack

Well if he prevents visitors from taking steps to protect themselves, then the landlord SHOULD be responsible. After all, it IS within his power to allow visitors to bring their weapons.


95 posted on 03/29/2006 11:06:10 AM PST by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson