[Dead Corpse]

Logical extension of the Castle Doctrine. I own my car. My employer can have no legal say as to it's contents. Also, I have a Right to carry my firearm while in my car to and from work. Giving my employer the legal authority to ban my gun from my car strips me of the ability to effectively provide for my own defense while commuting.

Allowing me to keep my gun in my car in no way infringes on the employers equal rights of property in their ownership of the parking lot or buildings. They own everything from the tar down, I own everything from the tires up.

[BritExPatInFla]

Yeah, but your castle is parked in your employer's parking lot. If nothing else, make the empoloyer exempt from prosecution from any shooting in the parking lot, then it makes a bit more sense to allow guns in cars parked on someone else's private property.

[Potowmack]

Logical extension of the Castle Doctrine. I own my car. My employer can have no legal say as to it's contents.

As a condition of bringing your car onto his property, he can require you to submit to a search of the vehicle. You are, of course, free to refuse and seek employment elsewhere.

Also, I have a Right to carry my firearm while in my car to and from work. Giving my employer the legal authority to ban my gun from my car strips me of the ability to effectively provide for my own defense while commuting.

Private citizens have no duty to help you exercise your rights. Your ability to defend yourself going to and from work is not your employer's concern.

Allowing me to keep my gun in my car in no way infringes on the employers equal rights of property in their ownership of the parking lot or buildings.

You have every right to keep your gun in your car. However, you have no right to use your employer's parking lot in violation of his rules.

[mcshot]

I'm with ya dead.

mc