[BritExPatInFla]

Yeah, but your castle is parked in your employer's parking lot. If nothing else, make the empoloyer exempt from prosecution from any shooting in the parking lot, then it makes a bit more sense to allow guns in cars parked on someone else's private property.

[Dead Corpse]

I'd be fine with such an exemption. I also have a "rider" in my employment contract stating that I am "disarmed" via coersion. That if ever there is an "incident" here at work that could have been prevented by a more 2A Rights friendly corporate policy, that the company will be held 100% liable for an damages to me.

They actually agreed. I guess they really DID want me working for them and were not just trying to engage in flattery.

[AdamSelene235]

If nothing else, make the empoloyer exempt from prosecution from any shooting in the parking lot, then it makes a bit more sense to allow guns in cars parked on someone else's private property.

If an employer disarms his employees and they are killed in a shooting, the employer should be sued for failing to provide security to the very people he made vulnerable in the first place.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

If nothing else, make the empoloyer exempt from prosecution from any shooting in the parking lot, then it makes a bit more sense to allow guns in cars parked on someone else's private property.

In that case, the easy way to outlaw guns is to make a buncy of laws that say "you cannot possess a gun within 1000 feet of [INSERT LOCATION TYPE HERE]."

That's what the Feds did with public schools. If you have a gun in your car and drive within a thousand feet of a public school, you have committed a felony.

I defy you to find a path from your work to your home that does not pass within a thousand feet of a public school.