Skip to comments.
Doomsday for Islam?
WorldNetDaily ^
| 3/28/06
| Robert Pfriender
Posted on 03/28/2006 2:38:09 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: LibWhacker
2
posted on
03/28/2006 2:41:36 PM PST
by
jjm2111
(http://www.purveryors-of-truth.blogspot.com)
To: LibWhacker
Any government supporting terror activities sets itself up for a retaliatory strike, even if they aren't responsible for this particular one.
Thus Iran and Syria are primary targets for retaliation, since it will be assumed that they had a hand in it.
3
posted on
03/28/2006 2:44:43 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: jjm2111
Have to remember to buy a supply of surgical masks so I don't have to breathe Muslim dust.
4
posted on
03/28/2006 2:45:18 PM PST
by
Ben Mugged
(labor unions are socialism's shock troops)
To: LibWhacker
5
posted on
03/28/2006 2:45:32 PM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rage is the fuel that powers the islamic machine)
To: LibWhacker
Neocon fantasies are getting weirder by the hour....
To: LibWhacker
I suggest that what was once MAD is now PIST (or more popularly known as P!SSED)...Preemptive strikes against Islamic Strategic Targets.
7
posted on
03/28/2006 2:45:47 PM PST
by
Dark Skies
(" For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. " Matthew 6:21)
To: LibWhacker
And one Ohio class Trident submarine by itself can wipe out half the cities on the earth.
8
posted on
03/28/2006 2:45:50 PM PST
by
navyblue
To: LibWhacker
Doomsday for Islam? YES!
9
posted on
03/28/2006 2:46:04 PM PST
by
Screamname
(Tagline)
To: LibWhacker
I always thought it was interesting that there were no Muslims on Star Trek.
10
posted on
03/28/2006 2:49:21 PM PST
by
Ragnar54
To: LibWhacker
The Islamofacists need to remember that Americans have a very long fuse, but at the end of the day, also remember that it is attached to a big f'in bomb.....
11
posted on
03/28/2006 2:49:29 PM PST
by
nevergore
(“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
To: LibWhacker
I very much doubt that a terrorist nuke would lead to a scattergun nuclear barrage against a range of Middle Eastern countries, including important strategic allies.
If a particular state was found to be complicit in the attack, that would very much be another matter of course.
12
posted on
03/28/2006 2:49:41 PM PST
by
Canard
To: LibWhacker
A terror nuke attack upon the United States would undoubtedly unleash a response by American strategic nuclear forces so violent and so encompassing that the very future of Islamic society around the world would likely be permanently wiped from the face of the planet. Painfully bad writing and grammar. Particularly the last clause.
To: LibWhacker
A terror nuke attack upon the United States would undoubtedly unleash a response by American strategic nuclear forces so violent and so encompassing that the very future of Islamic society around the world would likely be permanently wiped from the face of the planet.Undoubtedly? It depends who is in office.
"Ok, now let us be calm. New York and Washington may be gone, but we still have plenty of other cities."
14
posted on
03/28/2006 2:51:19 PM PST
by
Screamname
(Tagline)
To: jjm2111
"Daddy, what are Muslims?"Actually, the statement will be:
"Daddy, what were Muslims?"
15
posted on
03/28/2006 2:51:47 PM PST
by
Redleg Duke
(Kennedy and Kerry, the two Commissars of the Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts!)
To: Screamname
"Hitlary announcing declaration of peace negotiations and the return of the league of nations."
(earlier she admitted to speaking to the ghost of nevil chamberlin whom she said was also a devoute advocate of the third way.)
To: LibWhacker
I wish it were true, that we could start throwing nukes around the world like well-placed confetti.
Let's see the U.S. shoot at one GD mosque full of terrorists and bombs and guns first for Christ's sake. And not apologize on its knees afterwards.
Then I'll believe that we could do what needs to be done.
17
posted on
03/28/2006 2:57:50 PM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Screamname
If we could guarantee it was SF, it would be a good trade.
To: LibWhacker
Simply, our military planners would likely destroy every conceivable real or imagined threat to our country after we are attacked with a nukeand we would take care of our global warming situation also. Sounds like a plan to me.
19
posted on
03/28/2006 2:59:23 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Ragnar54
I always thought it was interesting that there were no Muslims on Star Trek.I think warp drive doesn't work on people from the 10th century.
20
posted on
03/28/2006 3:00:25 PM PST
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-159 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson