Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

From the article>>>"All the documents, which are available on fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm, have received at least a quick review by Arabic linguists and do not alter the government's official stance,"<<<<<

Does a "Quick review" count as intelligence analysis at the NYT? One would think that a true study would require extensive cross-comparisons and collations and so forth between documents, looking for patterns and stuff that may be missed by a quick review.

That appears to be happening now.


82 posted on 03/28/2006 7:40:24 AM PST by RugerM77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RugerM77
Intelligence officials had serious concerns about turning loose an army of amateurs on a warehouse full of raw documents that include hearsay, disinformation and forgery.

These docs were found in the stinking Iraqi Defense Ministry building. Why the he!! would there be hearsay and forgeries there? Arrogant pieces of excrement.

88 posted on 03/28/2006 8:18:07 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Self appointed RNC Press Secretary for Smarmy Sound Bites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson