Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedumb2003
But niceties like legal guardianship (or the law in general) mean nothing to many here.

Guardianship law means a lot more to people here than it does to Judge Greer. Once Michael declared his intention to marry Jodi Centonze, that made quite apparent and undeniable a craven interest in Terri's death which would outweigh any claimed legitimate interest he might have therein. As such, he was no longer legally entitled to be Terri's guardian.

Terri's parents filed in September of 2002 to remove Michael as guardian. When scheduling the hearing after Terri's second scheduled execution attempt proved insufficient, Judge Greer granted a continuance. When that proved insufficient, Michael simply refused to show up at the hearing. Because Greer somehow failed to give Michael official written notice of the hearing (never mind that he clearly knew about it) he declined to hold Michael in contempt and instead rescheduled the hearing well into the future. When that proved insufficient, he granted another continuance. And when Michael again failed to show up, "Oops... no proper notice. Sorry about that."

It was illegal for Michael to continue to act as Terri's guardian after declaring his engagement to Ms. Centonze. People here were wanting Judge Greer to follow the law.

96 posted on 03/27/2006 10:18:46 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Bump that, supercat.

And Terri's *wishes* to be dehydrated to death were nothing more than H E A R S A Y, suddenly *remembered* and first spoken of by *hubby* S E V E N years later.

He's one sick b-tard.

99 posted on 03/27/2006 10:38:47 PM PST by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
Guardianship law means a lot more to people here than it does to Judge Greer. Once Michael declared his intention to marry Jodi Centonze, that made quite apparent and undeniable a craven interest in Terri's death which would outweigh any claimed legitimate interest he might have therein. As such, he was no longer legally entitled to be Terri's guardian.

OK, I have heard this urban myth too many times. Please post the relevant EXACT statute that says this.

Terri's parents filed in September of 2002 to remove Michael as guardian. When scheduling the hearing after Terri's second scheduled execution attempt proved insufficient, Judge Greer granted a continuance. When that proved insufficient, Michael simply refused to show up at the hearing. Because Greer somehow failed to give Michael official written notice of the hearing (never mind that he clearly knew about it) he declined to hold Michael in contempt and instead rescheduled the hearing well into the future. When that proved insufficient, he granted another continuance. And when Michael again failed to show up, "Oops... no proper notice. Sorry about that."

Yes, well, proper notice is such a silly legal nicety. I think I will sue you, ask the newspaper to mention it, then not get around to actually serving you. When you don't show, I'll ask the judge to hold you in contempt for not being there when I wanted you to be.

Are you a lawyer? I really hope not.

It was illegal for Michael to continue to act as Terri's guardian after declaring his engagement to Ms. Centonze. People here were wanting Judge Greer to follow the law.

Again, what law? FR opinion isn't "law." He was the legal guardian. It takes a HECK OF A LOT of legal momentum to overcome stare decisis.

100 posted on 03/27/2006 10:43:04 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Don't call them "Illegal Aliens." Call them what they are: CRIMINAL INVADERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson