Title XLIII Chapter 744 section 474, among others.
"A guardian may be removed for any of the following reasons, and the removal shall be in addition to any other penalties prescribed by law: (11) Development of a conflict of interest between the ward and the guardian".
Do you deny that a married man who has betrothed himself to another woman would have an interest in seeking his wife's death, regardless of what his wife would want?
It's also worth noting that 744.446(1) states "The fiduciary relationship which exists between the guardian and the ward may not be used for the private gain of the guardian other than the remuneration for fees and expenses provided by law." Where did Michael get the money for his house and car? And when he was first trying to kill Terri--before her trust fund was drained, and thus when he would have stood to inherit hundreds of thousands of dollars--would not such funds have constituted "private gain"?
Yes, well, proper notice is such a silly legal nicety. I think I will sue you, ask the newspaper to mention it, then not get around to actually serving you. When you don't show, I'll ask the judge to hold you in contempt for not being there when I wanted you to be.
Do you think Greer's failure to provide written notice was accidental?
"A guardian may be removed for any of the following reasons, and the removal shall be in addition to any other penalties prescribed by law: (11) Development of a conflict of interest between the ward and the guardian".
Do you deny that a married man who has betrothed himself to another woman would have an interest in seeking his wife's death, regardless of what his wife would want?
So there is NO law that says an additional relationship is illegal. His wife had already made her desires known. Your interpretation of his motives is just that. I asked for the relevant information, you failed prima facie.
It's also worth noting that 744.446(1) states "The fiduciary relationship which exists between the guardian and the ward may not be used for the private gain of the guardian other than the remuneration for fees and expenses provided by law." Where did Michael get the money for his house and car? And when he was first trying to kill Terri--before her trust fund was drained, and thus when he would have stood to inherit hundreds of thousands of dollars--would not such funds have constituted "private gain"?
Standard fiduciary clause. Again, you look for things that do not exist. Mike had the legal right to deal with the fund and the legal responsibility to have her wishes carried out.
Thanks for finally putting an end to the legal fiction you folks hang on to. The Schiavo debacle makes it clear everyone should have their final wishes in writing (I now do). Yes, well, proper notice is such a silly legal nicety. I think I will sue you, ask the newspaper to mention it, then not get around to actually serving you. When you don't show, I'll ask the judge to hold you in contempt for not being there when I wanted you to be.
Do you think Greer's failure to provide written notice was accidental?
Irrelevant. You either have notice or not. Why would Greer err on purpose?
Thank you for helping me clarify the legal matters. And for removing once and for all the myth of Mike's so-called "illegal" dalliance (done at the urging of Terri's parents as you very well know).