Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/25/2006 8:07:18 PM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: ncountylee

Schumer and Graham going for TV time. Smile guys.


2 posted on 03/25/2006 8:08:57 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I wholly agree with the tariffs. We need to keep American products competitive, and that is simply impossible when competing with countries employing slave labor. If anything, those price hikes aren't high enough.


3 posted on 03/25/2006 8:09:56 PM PST by Number57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

The more I hear from Lindsey Graham, the less I like him.

If he has any further political aspirations than merely being a Senator, he might as well just change parties now.


4 posted on 03/25/2006 8:10:31 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

While I cringe at the monopoly on cheap production China holds, consider the source. Chucky Schumer. Nuff said.


6 posted on 03/25/2006 8:13:17 PM PST by Sender (As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. Be without form. -Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Obviously, the good Senators are ignorant of basic economics as well as US economic history. Similar protective tariffs, like the Smooy-Hawley Act, were disasters for US manufacturers. Besides what use do the Senators have in mind for the money extorted from the taxpayers by such a tax?


8 posted on 03/25/2006 8:16:36 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
China's communist government, which—according to Schumer and the rest—deliberately keeps its currency undervalued in order to sell more cheap imports to the United States and other countries.

Taht isn't the real problem. The real problem is that Red China has nuclear warheads aimed at the Unitd States, that it has goods made by slave labor and then dumps them in our country at below-market prices to get hard currency to fund that war machine, that it steals our technology, and that there is no freedom for the people -- if you ask for democracy, they'll run you over with their tanks.

That's why Chinese goods must not be circulated so freely in this country. By buying them, we're funding our own destruction. When we buy Chinese goods, we're paying for the enemy to build up its military strength against us.

9 posted on 03/25/2006 8:16:42 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I suppose I'm doing some kind of harm because I actually avoid buying Chinese products, even if I have to pay more for the item, right?


11 posted on 03/25/2006 8:19:36 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I would rather we pump money into new technologies (can you say NANO?). That's where the future bucks come from... the future! Only problem is, will American children be up to the challenge with their politically correct educations?


13 posted on 03/25/2006 8:20:10 PM PST by Visalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

What America needs to do is have wage and price controls demanding all able bodied persons work for $5 a day! That will show 'em!


16 posted on 03/25/2006 8:22:13 PM PST by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I support tariffs. I view them as one of the sole legitimate revenue streams for a gov't. But you gotta base them on economic sense. If you want to send a message, use UPS.


19 posted on 03/25/2006 8:23:38 PM PST by Bogey78O (<thinking of new tagline>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

We need tarrifs for unfrair trade engaged by China, so that China will be forced to change the value of Yuan and force fair trade.


24 posted on 03/25/2006 8:29:05 PM PST by Wiz (Nightmare of the Information Warfare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

"The Durabrand 10-inch portable DVD player available at Wal-Mart retails for $199.94. A group of senators would like to raise the price to $254.67"


If you want to protect the working man, then don't interfere when we finally get the opportunity to be able to afford stuff you wealthier people take for granted. I love Wal-mart it has improved my living standard. Unemployment is around 4.7% which is extraordinarily low. When you combine a job with low priced goods, that is a good thing. Ignore the old rust belt bosses and archaic economic thinking, if you raise that price, then I have to go without, and that is a real ,immediate fact, screw your chauvinist ideas that Americans, just have to make shoes or the world will end.


26 posted on 03/25/2006 8:33:06 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

The root of the word protectionism, is "protect".

Someone has to protect American industry, before we don't have any more.

Seriously.


28 posted on 03/25/2006 8:34:19 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee; A. Pole

Most people would not care about a $25 surcharge for an item they may get once every 5 years. The truth is "free" trade is a political loser, with people who are against it being very strongly against it, and most people who are for it being at best, lukewarm in their support.


30 posted on 03/25/2006 8:35:18 PM PST by RFT1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
The Durabrand 10-inch portable DVD player available at Wal-Mart retails for $199.94. A group of senators would like to raise the price to $254.67. The Creative Zen Nano Plus 512-megabyte MP3 player seems like a bargain at $89.72; less so at $114.39,

And even less so at the price it would cost to make here. Face it folks the production is not coming back here unless the cost to make it overseas becomes high enough to justify it. Most consumers will see the price "hike" and shrug it off as typical inflation.

41 posted on 03/25/2006 8:42:13 PM PST by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I thought there wasn't much money to be made putting electronic gizmos together, that's why we have them made overseas. (?) Its kind of a goodwill thing. Isn't Korea taking over some of these electronics manufacturing from China (who got it from Japan)?


47 posted on 03/25/2006 8:44:39 PM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I think I was way ahead of my time. In 1966 at UCSB, I had a sign in the window of my room on the 7th floor of San Miguel hall --- BOMB PEKING.


50 posted on 03/25/2006 8:46:48 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

I'm for tariffs... as in ZERO TARIFFS. Why tax citizens more? All tariffs and trade restrictions create are black markets. We have to compete with the world. Our industries should move into what we can do best. The currencies will equalize out -- unless the Chinese want to collect our paper dollars along with our baseball cards. If the Chinese want to use free slave labor to support our lavish life style of buying electronic gear for 1/2 off, so be it.

When it comes to defense goods, that's another story. When it comes to moving goods in and through our harbors and airports, that should be done by native born American labor because of security concerns.


77 posted on 03/25/2006 9:11:56 PM PST by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; Abbeville Conservative; ...
Lindsee and Chuckie.

Where's the pic of them holding hands?

South Carolina Ping

Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.

102 posted on 03/25/2006 9:33:54 PM PST by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
27.5 percent price hike

Whatever happened to 3% or 5% or even 10%? -
246 posted on 03/26/2006 6:15:01 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Money will buy you a fine dog but only love can make it wag it's tail :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson