Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full Statement by Conservative Blogger Who Resigned from Washington Post re Alleged Plagiarism
redstate.com ^ | March 24, 2006 | Ben Domenech

Posted on 03/24/2006 1:50:03 PM PST by summer

Red America, my new blog at washingtonpost.com, has been under attack since its launch. It is a conservative blog on a mainstream media site, so many of the attacks were expected. If one bothers to read it, I believe it stands as a welcome addition to the opinion debate.

The hate mail that I have received since the launch of this blog has been overwhelmingly profane and violent. My family has been threatened; my friends have been deluged; my phone has been prank called. The most recent email that showed up while writing this post talked about how the author would like to hack off my head, and wishes my mother had aborted me.

But in the course of accusing me of racism, homophobia, bigotry, and even (on one extensive Atrios thread) of having a sexual relationship with my mother, the leftists shifted their accusations to ones of plagiarism. You can find the major examples here: I link to this source only because I believe it's the only place that hasn't yet written about how they'd like to rape my sister.
I know that charges of plagiarism are serious. While I am not a journalist, I have, myself, written more than one thing that has been plagiarized in the past. But these charges have also served to create an atmosphere where no matter what is said on my Red America blog, leftists will focus on things with my byline from when I was a teenager.

I can rebut several of the alleged incidents here.
The most recent accusation, is that I stole a music review from Crosswalk and passed it off at National Review Online. In fact, I wrote both lists myself; I was one of Crosswalk's music review contributors at the time.

The Left has also accused me of foisting Sen. Frist quotes and some descriptive material from the Washington Post for a New York Press article on the Capitol Shooter. But the quotes I used were either properly credited or came from Sen. Frist’s press conference, which I attended along with many other reporters. So it is no surprise that we had similar quotes or similar descriptions of the same event. I have reams of notes and interviews about the events of that day. I also went over the entire piece step by step with NYPress editors to ensure that it was unquestionably solid before it ran.

Virtually every other alleged instance of plagiarism that I’ve seen comes from a single semester’s worth of pieces that were printed under my name at my college paper, The Flat Hat, when I was 17.

In one instance, I have been accused me of passing off P.J. O'Rourke's writing as my own in a column for the paper. But the truth is that I had met P.J. at a Republican event and asked his permission to do a college-specific version of his classic piece on partying. He granted permission, the piece was cleared with my editors at the paper, and it ran as inspired by O’Rourke’s original.

My critics have also accused me of plagiarism in multiple movie reviews for the college paper. I once caught an editor at the paper inserting a line from The New Yorker (which I read) into my copy and protested. When that editor was promoted, I resigned. Before that, insertions had been routinely made in my copy, which I did not question. I did not even at that time read the publications from which I am now alleged to have lifted material. When these insertions were made, I assumed, like most disgruntled writers would, that they were unnecessary but legitimate editorial additions.

But all these specifics are beside the point. Considering that all of this happened almost eight years ago, and that there are no files or notes that I've kept from that brief stint, it is simply my word against the liberal blogosphere on these examples. It becomes a matter of who you believe.

The truth is, a more responsible teenager would've nipped this sort of thing in the bud. A less sloppy writer would have made sure that material copied from other places never made it into a published piece, and never necessitated apologies or explanations that will do nothing to stop the critics. I was wrong not to do so.


But I do have one other collegiate example that might be to the point. When I was a junior in college, I wrote an article about liberal protests against Henry Kissinger’s visit to our campus. The leftists featured in the piece tried to get me kicked out of school. They mounted a six-month campaign against me. They posted fliers about me on campus. They sent me reams of hate mail. Ultimately, they were unsuccessful – the Honor Council completely cleared my name and the article as the truth. The events of the past 72 hours seem like a rerun of that experience.

The truth is, no conservative could write for the Post without being subject to the gauntlet of the liberal attack machine. There is no question in my mind that any RedState contributor writing for this blog would have found leftists delving through his high school yearbooks and grade school book reports in an effort to discredit and defame him. And if you too were a sloppy teenage writer, your errors or the errors of others would’ve been exploded.

I have a great many friends who are willing to stand and defend me on this. I appreciate their support. I have enormous respect for Jim Brady and the vision he has at WPNI. But while the folks at washingtonpost.com understand my position and are convinced by my arguments on many of these issues, they also feel that the firestorm here will only serve to damage us all, and that there is no way this blog can continue without being permanently tagged to this firestorm. Therefore, I have resigned this position with washingtonpost.com.

This is a shame. As you all know, I am a conservative, but not a partisan – I believe had this blog been allowed to continue, it would have been a significant addition to the Post's site. The Post showed bravery by including a conservative voice, and I hope they continue to seek that balance. While my blog was only alive for a week, it did have one result that was encouraging. If the change of heart described here continues, it will all have been worth it.

To my friends: thank you for your support. To my enemies: I take enormous solace in the fact that you spent this week bashing me, instead of America.

Regards,

Ben


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bendomenech; campus; conservativeblogger; corettascottking; danamilbank; davidbrock; demagogicparty; districtofcolumbia; domenech; jimbrady; leftwingintolerance; lynching; mediamatters; memebuilding; nationalreview; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; plagerism; plagerized; plagiairizing; plagiarism; plagiarist; redamerica; redstate; statement; teens; wapo; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; weblogs; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: FreedomSurge

Yes, I, too, look forward to discussions about what he wrote here.


41 posted on 03/24/2006 2:35:17 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: summer
It sounds like some other people made mistakes and so on, and so on, and, things pile up, as we all know.

That's true. More info may be forthcoming.

42 posted on 03/24/2006 2:35:45 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Here here, I second that motion!


43 posted on 03/24/2006 2:36:11 PM PST by weegee ("Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but Democrats believe every day is April 15.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Whether or not more info comes, it will be interesting to hear how his accusers deal with what he's sayinig here.


44 posted on 03/24/2006 2:37:25 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Whether or not more info comes, it will be interesting to hear how his accusers deal with what he's saying here.


45 posted on 03/24/2006 2:37:39 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Just hope the new guy or girl has thick skin and a squeeky clean life.

With the internet it's become much easier to dig up dirt on someone who writes. I suspect the great majority of journalists have been guilty of plagiarism at some time. They just didn't get caught. The current college culture also encourages plagiarism.

46 posted on 03/24/2006 2:38:59 PM PST by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: summer
So, no matter what you may believe or get from all this -- a right to due process and free speech is still important!

I didn't realize he was being prosecuted. What is he charged with?

47 posted on 03/24/2006 2:41:05 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nosofar

well, we now know how to get liberals fired. :)


48 posted on 03/24/2006 2:46:57 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: summer

mark


49 posted on 03/24/2006 2:50:26 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

for later


50 posted on 03/24/2006 2:51:46 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
The Post showed bravery by including a conservative voice, and I hope they continue to seek that balance.

Whether or not the guy actually plagiarized I don't know but the Washington Post knew the perception could be made, which is why they selected him for the job.

51 posted on 03/24/2006 2:57:08 PM PST by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Until he made this statement, it certainly seemed he would not be heard, since no one was quoting any statements by him.

I believe the right to be heard is something you're allowed no matter if it's a civil or criminal matter. Correct me if I'm wrong about that.
52 posted on 03/24/2006 2:58:21 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis

I'm not sure if they knew that or not -- maybe you're right. I don't know.


53 posted on 03/24/2006 2:59:49 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: summer

Plagiarism, and "racism", that's worse than moider these days in this here paradise of perfect humans, doncha know? Tempest, meet teapot.


54 posted on 03/24/2006 3:00:21 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
But the truth is that I had met P.J. at a Republican event and asked his permission to do a college-specific version of his classic piece on partying. He granted permission, the piece was cleared with my editors at the paper, and it ran as inspired by O’Rourke’s original.

What a lame attempt at an excuse. He took entire segments of O Rourke's piece and used them verbatim. That's not a different version, that's plagiarism.

Not only is he a plagiarist, he's not man enough to take responsibility for his own misdeeds. Let's hope this incident buries him, because the conservative movement doesn't need guys like this.

55 posted on 03/24/2006 3:02:55 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
Well, I think you are saying he did something wrong with intent to do wrong. I'm not sure that's the case. Is it possible he didn't know, at that time, what "an inspired by" piece really should be? [NOT a "copying."] It sounds he was trying to find out by clearing it with others, but, that turned out not to be sufficient.

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt because he was young and in college at the time. And, he went to the trouble of asking the author.

A real plagiarist does not go to the author and ask permission to plagiarize because the intent there is NOT to seek "permission."
56 posted on 03/24/2006 3:20:06 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: summer
I believe the right to be heard is something you're allowed no matter if it's a civil or criminal matter. Correct me if I'm wrong about that.

Your employer can't fire you because of your public statements?

57 posted on 03/24/2006 3:21:29 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

But, here's a question: Where's the college professor who should have been advising those college kids running and writing the college newspaper?


58 posted on 03/24/2006 3:22:36 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: summer
Anyone who's in college knows about plagiarism. We drill it into students. It's the responsibility of anyone working for a newspaper, or otherwise writing for a living, to know.

There are, in addition, far more incidents of plagiarism than he acknowledges in this 'apology'.

59 posted on 03/24/2006 3:23:04 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

I think you want to drag me into some kind of flame war based on I don't know what, but, I'm not going. Have fun on your own!


60 posted on 03/24/2006 3:23:30 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson