[Soul Seeker]

Contrary to opinion...I do read.

And can trace the origin of the conversation back to at least post #240.

The context of the discussion is that newbies need to be educated about the Clinton's, because then we'd recognize any Republican is preferable in office.

In otherwords? It is alledged those issuing a refusal to vote for McCain are unaware of the Democrats' intent should they be returned to power. This is flat out untrue. I am quite aware of the consequences of a Democrat in power. I have weighed those consequences against McCain holding power. I'd rather take my chances with Hillary. This is my perogative, as it is many of those forum and beyond. A perogative not born of ignorance but given with example after example of why this decision has been reached.

We've had disagreements before, we'll have them again. But this disagreement is not based on anything so infantile as idealogical purities nor ignorance of the Democrats intent.

[Howlin]

The context of the discussion is that newbies need to be educated about the Clinton's, because then we'd recognize any Republican is preferable in office.

Hogwash.

She and I were discussing HILLARY; I made the remark that I was amazed at how many people don't KNOW all the stuff I link up and I explain it to them. That conversation didn't have anything to do with you or what you've been posting.

You are a little too touchy on this subject.

[TAdams8591]

Actually, for my end of that discussion, you read way too much into the comment.

I don't know what Howlin was thinking and couldn't speak for her though I could guess, but I won't. : )

And frankly, I don't consider you a newbie.