Why? What is the benefit of blurring the distinction between the GOP and the Democrats?
At least when clinton was president, the Congress stood against him most of the time. All sorts of garbage became law under Bush and I believe that it would only get worse if McCain was in there.
I saw an interview on Fox last week sometime with some of their stock market people...and they said that the Stock Market would probably LOVE for the dems to take over at least one of the houses of Congress...
Just because of the spending part...that Bush would come closer to vetoing a spending bill if the dems are in control of one House..
However, if the House goes to the dems...Bush will have more to worry about than spending bills..it will be impeachment.
There is no blur when it comes to comparing a Liberal Dem to a liberal Republican. The Dems have gone so far to the left they should actually call themselves what they are - Marxists. The most liberal Republican out there does not even begin to compare.
Hence I will be voting Republican, if nothing else to keep the Marxists out of power.
An interesting point that is remains true only if congress maintains a Republican majority.
" All sorts of garbage became law under Bush and I believe that it would only get worse if McCain was in there."
All sorts of garbage became bad law under Clinton starting with all those executive orders, not to mention all the bad law and bad precedent established by the Democrat Judges Clinton appointed to the judiciary.
I beginning to wonder Badray, if there is ever a time you advocate voting for a Republican.