Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minutemen Protest In Costa Mesa (pics) ACLU Meeting to Help Illegals
3/17/06

Posted on 03/17/2006 10:24:42 PM PST by Ladycalif

MIRNA BURCIAGA, OWNER OF EL CHANACO RESTAURANT, located at 19th St. and Maple St. in Costa Mesa, is against Mayor Mansoor's plan to have the Costa Mesa Police Dept. assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to arrest criminal illegal aliens.

MIRNA BURCIAGA is also a racial supremacist member/supporter of La Raza/Mecha/Maldef/La Voz


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: border; immigrantlist; immigration; minutemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-254 next last
To: clawrence3
It's called a hypothetical - I will take Marine Inspector's opinion over yours any day.

It's not his opinions I have trouble with.

21 posted on 03/19/2006 8:02:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Take away Light, and what's that leave?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: everyone

These people are heroes and deserve huge support of every kind.

Next time a Democratic friend complains about immigration, and especially about Republicans not controlling it, ask him/her how many Minutemen -- the people actually doing something about the problem -- are Democrats, and what party the thugs who attack the Minutemen are in.


22 posted on 03/19/2006 8:06:33 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

Well, let me see - the President called the Minutemen "vigilantes" and last I checked, he was a Republican.


23 posted on 03/19/2006 8:14:11 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

>>>"Get an old Crown Vic and paint 'INS' on it and park it near the dweeb's restaurant."

Now there's a novel solution: fleets of old Crown Vics cruising worker pickup sites across the U.S.

Finally a way to salvage the private market's preferred choice of cabbies and salesmen during the 70's and 80's.

Here's comments (from MotorTrend):

"A [2006] black LX Sport looks a lot like an unmarked police car, so other drivers often will slow down and move to the right lane when you come up behind them, an extremely useful feature for highway commuters.

...if your ultimate goal is to play “Hawaii Five-O” or be Travis Bickle, the Crown Vic is definitely the car for you—at least until the police version of the Charger hits the streets.

A definitive American sedan, the Crown Victoria appeals most to drivers who remember first-hand the classic cars from the 1960s. Otherwise, the Crown Vic is best left to the professionals."

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/intellichoice/369_0509_review_2006_ford_crown_victoria/index2.html

They forgot to mention that for the younger crowd, the Crown Vic still has a bench seat in the front for convenient Friday night smooching.


24 posted on 03/19/2006 8:25:40 PM PST by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

I mean the people who LITERALLY attack the Minutemen.

Bush's mind has been colonized by the liberal perspective on immigration. He is simply wrong on this issue, wrong to the extent of insulting the patriots who take action on this.

Again, I'm referring to the people who LITERALLY attack the Minutemen. And to the fact that (I assume) very few Minutemen are Democrats.

In short, don't be stupid.


25 posted on 03/19/2006 8:37:37 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hop A Long Cassidy; VeniVidiVici

In the State of California, it is against the law to impersonate a law enforcement officer: Penal Code Sec. 538(d) "Fraudulent Impersonation of A Peace Officer"


26 posted on 03/19/2006 8:52:31 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

And what "Peace Officer" will be impersonated?


27 posted on 03/19/2006 8:53:44 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

Well, first of all, you responded to a post between me and EternalVigilence (even though you changed it to "everyone"). Some here think Bush is worse than a "thug" for his position on immigration, whether he LITERALLY attacked a Minuteman or not. Lastly, are you talking about actual, physical violence - or a personal attack like calling someone "stupid" online?


28 posted on 03/19/2006 8:56:52 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Federal immigration agents (according to the posts). There is a federal statute against that as well, Since more and more local authorities are contemplating enforcing federal laws on the subject, that's why I said Penal Code 538(d) could be implicated.


29 posted on 03/19/2006 9:01:05 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3


Oh, put a sock in it. Bush is stupid. The people who try to bust up the Minutemen's events and threaten violence against them are evil.

If you don't understand that kind of difference, you don't understand anything.


30 posted on 03/19/2006 9:02:19 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

My response was to the post immediately before mine.
It was signed by "clawrence3."

That's you.


31 posted on 03/19/2006 9:04:33 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Here's the California statute:

"Any person other than one who by law is given the authority of a peace officer, who willfully wears, exhibits, or uses the authorized uniform, insignia, emblem, device, label, certificate, card, or writing, of a peace officer, with the intent of fraudulently impersonating a peace officer, or of fraudulently inducing the belief that he or she is a peace officer, is guilty of a misdemeanor."

So, I guess it would come down to what the intent was to "Get an old Crown Vic and paint 'INS' on it and park it near the dweeb's restaurant."


32 posted on 03/19/2006 9:05:10 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Sorry, but you are wrong. I said to paint "INS" on the Crown Vics. INS is not a federal agency. Therefore painting "INS" on one's vehicle could not be construed as impersonating a "peace officer".

Except maybe to you and a bunch of illegal Mexicans.

33 posted on 03/19/2006 9:06:12 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

I'm sorry you won't answer the question, so that I could understand the difference - you're right though, I must not know anything, even after going to law school and all.


34 posted on 03/19/2006 9:06:43 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Here's hoping no one with a worthy case hires you.


35 posted on 03/19/2006 9:08:22 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

Your post #22 was to EternalVigilante's post #21.


36 posted on 03/19/2006 9:09:09 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

Nice to meet you too. If you really don't want to engage in a civil discussion, that's fine with me.


37 posted on 03/19/2006 9:09:56 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The "intent" is all that would matter.


38 posted on 03/19/2006 9:12:42 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Sure, it would be. And the state would be all over it to prosecute.


39 posted on 03/19/2006 9:13:39 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3

Scroll back and you'll see that my 22 was to "everyone" and had nothing to do with 21.

My next post was a response to your 23, which was to me.

While I think you are blind and unfair in equating Bush to the anti-Minutemen thugs, or suggesting he's worse, I still commend you for any involvement you have in this issue. It is a difficult one, and many "conservatives" shy away from it, which is cowardly.


40 posted on 03/19/2006 9:14:54 PM PST by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson