[Sun]

The Science behind ID:

Intelligent Design Science: http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_idtheory.htm

AND

http://acs.ucsd.edu/~idea/irredcomplex.htm

AND The Science Behind Intelligent Design Theory
http://acs.ucsd.edu/~idea/idscience.htm

[Ichneumon]

In rebuttal to your Dembski link: The advantages of theft over toil: the design inference and arguing from ignorance

In rebuttal to your "irreducible complexity" link: My critique of Behe's "irreducible complexity" and its fatal flaws

In rebuttal to your third linke ("The Science Behind Intelligent Design Theory"), all I need do is point out that it doesn't contain any material that actually supports its title -- it discusses neither "the science" nor describes any "theory" of "intelligent design". It just hand-waves about the author's belief that function requires design, which is just the fallacy of assuming the conclusion, and is addressed and rebutted in my first link.