To: LouAvul
Both sides? Why wouldn't they include all religious creation myths?
2 posted on
03/14/2006 10:58:11 AM PST by
balrog666
(Come and see my new profile! Changed yet again!)
To: balrog666
I'm gonna say that most religions (save a few) agree with the possibility of a designer. Schools would not be teaching which is the true creator. Teachers would be presenting arguments supporting the possibility of a creator(s).
You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder.
James 2:19
8 posted on
03/14/2006 11:22:52 AM PST by
conservative_crusader
(The voice of truth, tells me a different story. The voice of truth says do not be afraid.)
To: balrog666
Both sides? Why wouldn't they include all religious creation myths?Exactly. If it's okay to teach Christian/Jewish views of creation, why not Wiccaism? Hinduism? Occultism?
18 posted on
03/14/2006 11:53:59 AM PST by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(Karen Ryan reporting...)
To: balrog666
Why wouldn't they include all religious creation myths?
I didn't know evolution covered creation. The other side of evolution wouldn't cover creation, would it?
29 posted on
03/14/2006 8:00:22 PM PST by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson