To: satchmodog9
Even if the states rights issue were valid, the state is also the enemy of freedom.State's rights aren't constitutional? The rights of states are antithetical to individual rights? WTF are you talking about?
41 posted on
03/13/2006 3:54:24 PM PST by
delacoert
(imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
To: delacoert
delacoert wrote:
State's rights aren't constitutional? The rights of states are antithetical to individual rights? WTF are you talking about?
See #45, and feel free to comment.
47 posted on
03/13/2006 4:11:32 PM PST by
tpaine
To: delacoert
Gun control advocates have argued for the states’ rights model, which deems the key phrase “a well regulated militia,” and speaks only to a collective right that could be exercised by citizens rallying against federal tyranny or outside aggression.Answering his assertion. I didn't use the best choice of words. Sorry.
52 posted on
03/13/2006 4:21:20 PM PST by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson