[PetroniusMaximus]

"Irrelevant. That is a philosophical discussion, not a scientific one."

So the nature of the universe, astrophysics, cosmology are now not scientific topics, but rather irrelevant "philosophical" ones?

"Not by positing a Brahma in an egg as the beginning of things."

Not even by positing a Singularity???



Now how about answering the question? It's germane to your contention that Creation is a "myth".

[freedumb2003]

So the nature of the universe, astrophysics, cosmology are now not scientific topics, but rather irrelevant "philosophical" ones?

LOL! The way you phrased it, yes.

"Not by positing a Brahma in an egg as the beginning of things."

Not even by positing a Singularity???

A Singularity doesn't prove your creation myth.

Now how about answering the question? It's germane to your contention that Creation is a "myth".

Cosmology is a scientific endeavor using scientific methods. You say that the Biblical creation myth is truth. I say it is a Brahma in an egg. Both are equally true. And neither is science nor provable.

You can't win this one. You are out of the game.