Posted on 03/09/2006 11:30:41 PM PST by Tim Long
LOL!! Don't forget "Microsoft Works!" :)
You have none, just your fables. You don't have the brains to try to understand the universe, you need an easy, sloppy answer so you don't have to think further.
You just explained your belief in evolution perfectly. Sloppy science and silly fables.
Thank you for your honestly.
You win.
Jackasses do, proven by the evo's dogmatic braying on FR.
Funny how they even managed to save animals only found in places like Canada and Argentina. Must have had some amazing rescue efforts, none of which seem to have been documented in the Bible.
Noah's Flood magically creates the fossil record, conveniently putting more primative forms of life at the bottom, and more advanced types nearer to the surface.
It also sorted them nicely so that no humans or their tools they might have used to build the ark are found anywhere near the fossils the Flood created.
Now that is impressive. I was unaware of that.
THe time limit shouldn't matter. I don't think the ark is going anywhere. It hasn't for 6000 years.
Again, you bring nothing to the debate.
Tell me how them poor koala's got home.
You duck and weave, but you don't have answers. You can't use the scientific method, because you are unable.
Answer my questions regarding the ark.
How did all them animals get home?
How did they eat?
How could someone build a boat so big as to house them?
If you want to believe in fables, fine, but have the balls to stand up to your belief and prove it.
I guess the fundamentalist religious answer would be that God created all that evidence just to confuse people and test their faith.
Now that would be some hard core turbulence if it mixed the Precambrian remains with the modern remains.
Oh boy.
I told you already, you rejected my answers by saying that the bible was full of fables and that the power of God had nothing to do with it. That's not my problem it's yours. So relax little guy and take a deep breath.
If you want to believe in fables, fine, but have the balls to stand up to your belief and prove it.
This is silly.
I'm standing up for my beliefs that's why we're having this delightful discussion.
The only one believing in fables is you, silly little boy fables, full of monkey men, skull fragments and tar pits.
Good luck with all that.
He also said that some of the same individuals are quietly excited "...off the record" about this discovery.
That's ape-men and complete skulls (see photo below).
And the good tar pits are in southern California, where there is no record of hominid evolution.
Site: Nariokotome, West Turkana, Kenya (1)
Discovered By: K. Kimeu, 1984 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.6 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7, 10), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Male (based on pelvis, browridge) (1, 8, 9)
Cranial Capacity: 880 (909 as adult) cc (1)
Information: Most complete early hominid skeleton (80 bones and skull) (1, 8)
Interpretation: Hairless and dark pigmented body (based on environment, limb proportions) (7, 8, 9). Juvenile (9-12 based on 2nd molar eruption and unfused growth plates) (1, 3, 4, 7, 8). Juvenile (8 years old based on recent studies on tooth development) (27). Incapable of speech (based on narrowing of spinal canal in thoracic region) (1)
Nickname: Turkana Boy (1), Nariokotome Boy
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=38
The water canopy theory accounts for the extra water, but I couldn't tell you where the water went afterwards.
It's around 2300 BC, actually.
Pssst. Continental drift.
Uhhh... The former is sort of what the Christian faith hinges on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.