Skip to comments.
Why Iran's oil bourse can't break the buck
asian times ^
| Mar 10, 2006
| F William Engdahl
Posted on 03/09/2006 8:39:46 PM PST by Flavius
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
03/09/2006 8:39:50 PM PST
by
Flavius
To: Flavius; Travis McGee
2
posted on
03/09/2006 8:44:28 PM PST
by
vrwc0915
To: AdmSmith
3
posted on
03/09/2006 8:48:02 PM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: Flavius
4
posted on
03/09/2006 8:49:05 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: vrwc0915
I had to look up "bourse" omline.
Sure hope I'm not the only one.
I can see you all snickering in front of your monitors "This clod doesn't even know what a bourse is".
5
posted on
03/09/2006 8:51:44 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
To: Flavius
Exactly right. We need to continue to flex our muscle and stay on top. The minute we slip, we're done for.
To: capt. norm
Bourse: stock exchange.
Bourse is a French word.
To: Nonstatist
Bourse is the new gravitas.
To: Flavius
9
posted on
03/09/2006 9:13:27 PM PST
by
4U2OUI
(???)
To: crushelits
Bourse: stock exchange.Thanx. You gave me a more, concise definition than I was able to find via Google.
I had the awful feeling that everybody else knew all about what it meant and I just walked in from Gooberville.
10
posted on
03/09/2006 9:21:45 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue)
To: Flavius
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
11
posted on
03/09/2006 9:25:00 PM PST
by
PGalt
To: PGalt; All
F William Engdahl is author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press) Well, I guess that says it all!
Full Disclosure: Is it true nobody has ever seen Engdahl and Art Bell in the same room simultaneously?
Cheers!
12
posted on
03/09/2006 9:40:36 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Flavius
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: capt. norm
I had the awful feeling that everybody else knew all about what it meant and I just walked in from Gooberville.Don't sweat it! When something like that happens we all just discuss it through FReepmail so you don't be humiliated in public.
Yes, I'm being evil. I'd never heard of it until two weeks ago. ;o)
To: Nonstatist
Yup......Fiat money is a funny thing.... a double edged sword
RE:> Fiat money:
Fiat money is a monetary standard (usually paper money) that people are required by law to accept as a medium of exchange and/or a standard of deferred payment. It is money by the "fiat" -- the command -- of the sovereign.
http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/money/defn.html
16
posted on
03/10/2006 1:19:29 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: capt. norm
A bourse is a bourse, of course, of course...
17
posted on
03/10/2006 2:20:42 AM PST
by
The Duke
To: Flavius; FARS
With the 400% price rise, nations such as France, Germany and Japan suddenly found reason to try to buy their oil directly in their own currencies - French francs, Deutschmarks or Japanese yen - to lessen the pressure on their rapidly declining reserves of trade dollars. The US Treasury and the Pentagon made certain that did not happen, partly with some secret diplomacy by Kissinger, bullying threats, and a whopping-big US military agreement with the key OPEC producer, Saudi Arabia. At that time it helped that the shah of Iran was seen in Washington to be a vassal of Kissinger. The point was not that the US dollar became a "petro" currency. The point was that the reserve status of the dollar, now a paper currency, was bolstered by the 400% increase in world demand for dollars to buy oil. But that was only a part of the dollar story. In 1979, after the accession to power of the ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in Iran, oil prices shot through the roof for the second time in six years. Yet, paradoxically, later that year the dollar began a precipitous free-fall, not a rise. It was no "petrodollar".
So, using the oil crisis to secure dollars strengthens the dollar by making people use dollars to buy oil, but NOT buying oil in dollars wont hurt??
As for the latter dollar plunge, that was all the trade items we engage in, not just one, and people eventually had to come back to the dollar.
If oil goes off the dollar, they dont HAVE to come back to the dollar. This guy is contradicting himself.
18
posted on
03/10/2006 2:41:49 AM PST
by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: Certain_Doom
Great article, but I see the defense of the dollar as a benefit from bombing Iran, not the primary motivation.Yes. The author is putting the cart before the horse.
19
posted on
03/10/2006 2:51:08 AM PST
by
gotribe
(Just tired of going easy on islam)
To: capt. norm
Lol. You mean the turnip truck you were riding in came from Gooberville?
20
posted on
03/10/2006 5:17:50 AM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson