Replies

EM2,
let's go over some of your fears.

You know the old adage, “Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.”? Introduce divine intervention into science, and it’ll be endlessly ridiculed, student’s interring it into formulas, suggesting it while brain storming, excusing failure with it, etc… Go ahead a put it into Calculus while your at it.

If our adolescents were compelled to go to Purdue where you encountered evangelical excesses, I’d be more concerned, but wouldn’t conclude that two wrongs make a right.

Teaching non-science in science is like marrying homosexuals. It potentially allows anything in, blurring its methods through lack of standards and corrupting its results.

These are simply your own paranoid fears. As the saying goes "even paranoids are right sometimes". Unfortunately for you that is not the case here. You never provided any facts or evidence to back them up. Honestly evangilical excess at Purdue, that really is a little over the top.disingenuous as your “Warmest Regards”.

Who are you to doubt or judge my sincerity? My dear Elfman when I say Warmest Regards I do mean it, otherwise I would not bother replying to you at all, in that I have much better and more profitable things to do.

I would suggest that you spend some time studying just how complex life is and then delve into the problems of randomness accounting for the design of it. My original assertion is that entropy simple disallows complex information systems from forming on their own. No one here can dispute that. the best they can argue is that the earth is not a closed system. The reply is "So what" you still have to have a system in place to organize the energy. A simple anecdote is why does my Mercedes Benz rust? Well, it is entropy. Think about it.

Kindest Regards
Boiler Plate