[Dimensio]

I promote the teaching of Intelligent Design because it conveys essential elements of the Creation Story.

However, this does not answer my question. Are you saying that the truth value of Intelligent Design is not a consideration?

As to Darwinism being "valid science," I don't accept that. Never have. It's humanist cock & bull.

Can you please justify this claim? What makes the theory of evolution (note that "Darwnisim" is not a branch of science, the correct term is the study of evolution) "humanist cock & bull" and not valid science?

[Ichneumon]

Ping me if he ever steps up to the plate and attempts to honestly answer those questions.