Posted on 03/07/2006 2:34:37 PM PST by SirLinksalot
Well, then it seems you should check the light switch. It also seems that until you've checked the light switch, and established there are fingerprints there, you shouldn't go around telling people there's evidence on the light switch.
There you go!
Autocad® is a tool, just like a compass.
I was in an outfit that designed circuit boards during the transtion from mylar and tape to using computer programs. Similar problems occured.
They were naughty.
Why? Why would a nonfunctional part of the genome be similar?
You could, but you would have no way of verifying the analysis. And the further back you go, the higher the possibility of being in error.
Yes, but since we have a large volume of data, we can quantify the error.
Don't confuse the ideal and the adherants.
Most of us were REAL assholes before we became believers!
And also, if the fossil record results from the Flood the earth was extremely crowded before the Flood, to say the least. There cannot have been room for anything to move. Crammed like sardines. It isn't surprising that God got rid of most of them.
Already? Wow. And I thought it was cause and effect.
ROFL!
The judge in the Dover case was appointed by President Bush.
So you're accusing him of appointing crooked judges.
(Especially if it's ME!)
We are told, over and over to clean up our act. It ain't easy, 'cause you see, we have this SINFUL NATURE that is at the door; waiting to take over the moment we slip up in our self discipline.
Feedback is ALWAYS good; be it from a fellow believer or from someone who has not yet trusted in Jesus' promises.
Ah, President G W Bush, that well-known appointer of communist activist judges.
Before does not exclude after placemarker.
NIV 1 John 2:18-23
18. Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.
19. They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us.
20. But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and all of you know the truth.
21. I do not write to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it and because no lie comes from the truth.
22. Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist--he denies the Father and the Son.
23. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.NIV 1 John 4:1-3
1. Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
2. This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God,
3. but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.NIV 2 John 1:7-8
7. Many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist.
8. Watch out that you do not lose what you have worked for, but that you may be rewarded fully.
I forget. Did your original post have a point, or were we just supposed to imagine one? Perhaps you can explain why creation science, or ID never bothers to look at all?
Sounds like I'm the anti-Christ by those definitions. Going down in the world.
Then this PROOF should be easy to replicate.
I do not doubt that you are convinced, but was it 'proof' that did it, or convincing ideas that told you how it COULD have happened?
Hey, we could apply this to physics class too. There might be some material somewhere that doesn't feel the force of gravity. If we could find that material, we could build all sorts of star ships. We should spend at least as much time on that possibility as teaching student about the objects that do obey 'universal' gravitation, which is, after all, only a theory.
And how do we know there are no unicorns, hmmm? Have scientists looked everywhere? Yep, zoology class needs unicorns.
Thank you so much, together we've just validated my original post...
Your simple happiness is charming.
Are you calling me a liar?
I've already answered your question.
Charming placemarker
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.