Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nuconvert

Would you mind explaining why it was "not unexpected"?

Dana appeared very healthy to me!


17 posted on 03/07/2006 5:33:35 AM PST by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry
Would you mind explaining why it was "not unexpected"?

Because she had lung cancer and not too many survive that.

27 posted on 03/07/2006 5:37:25 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

It was reported not long ago that she had lung cancer. She went fast.


40 posted on 03/07/2006 5:40:12 AM PST by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

Very sad. I heard not long ago that she was doing okay.


41 posted on 03/07/2006 5:40:15 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

It's been in the news over the past few months.


59 posted on 03/07/2006 5:47:25 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry
Would you mind explaining why it was "not unexpected"?

It was revealed she had lung cancer several months ago..........

63 posted on 03/07/2006 5:49:28 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

It was announced shortly after Christophers death she had lung cancer. I am sorry for the family, but not suprised.


68 posted on 03/07/2006 5:50:19 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

She was diagnosed with lung cancer.


182 posted on 03/07/2006 6:57:53 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know. Go Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

The death of a spouse especially when involving long term hospitalization can result in an increase of the risk of death in the surving spouse for up to two years. There is an emotional burden and our emotions effect our immune system and other body systems also many times a person who is so focused on the well being of their spouse will set aside care for themselves. This is sad but hopefully it is not so in another place where Chris Reeve stands tall. I pray their son Will(13) has the strength to deal with this.

http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/feb2006/nia-15a.htm


206 posted on 03/07/2006 7:31:59 AM PST by Ma3lst0rm (Liberals are often nothing without their public funding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry
Would you mind explaining why it was "not unexpected"?

Dana appeared very healthy to me!

Lung cancer is usually fatal. Not many people survive it. My husband died of lung cancer, and it's a very painful way to die. He was, a heavy smoker. She was a non smoker.

282 posted on 03/07/2006 9:48:03 AM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson