As usual, nothing that happens in the Middle East is exactly what it appears to be. This standoff could end in several ways and I don't expect any military action until after the mid-term election in November. Right now we're communicating with Iran and trying to make them fully understand our position. It's starting to look like Iran's strategy is to stall and outlast the Bush Administration, then hope the next President is weaker and allows Iran to build nuclear weapons and dominate Europe and the Middle East. Our strategy must be to bring this crisis to an acceptable conclusion during 2007.
He does not want to pass a nuke armed Iran to the next Admin.
Agreed. This is a serious issue that can't be left go until the next administration. Not only could they have a bomb by the time a new administration is in place, that new administration could be a bunch of idiots who want to look the other way like Clinton did with N. Korea.
Oh he did make that deal to say he did something, but then he allowed them to continue while the American public was enjoying the "peace" created by Clinton and Albright.
I believe I read, or heard, that President Bush has explicitly stated he will not pass the problem of a potential nuclear Iran on to the succeeding administration.
At any rate - this problem will not wait - certainly not until Nov. 2008. Israel will act before then - way before then - in my estimation.
"...then hope the next President is weaker and allows Iran to build nuclear weapons and dominate Europe and the Middle East."
Oh no! Is Jimmy Carter running?