Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreenFreeper
there is in fact massive evidence to support safe utilization of DDT. the response to DDT decades ago was emotive and political NOT scientific
79 posted on 03/03/2006 6:44:11 AM PST by Kelly_2000 ( Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: Kelly_2000
there is in fact massive evidence to support safe utilization of DDT. the response to DDT decades ago was emotive and political NOT scientific

I don't think anyone here is saying DDT should be completely banned. If used properly and at low levels it can be completely safe. Despite what selective research you may read, DDT does have health concerns. The fact is there are safer ways to control mosquito populations. Further, when was the last time we had a malaria outbreak in the US? I don't know how we survived without DDT /sarcasm.

I agree the decision to ban DDT in the US was probably emotive and political but the widespread use in agriculture was certainly problematic. DDT would not have been effective and it would have cause some environmental damage if we had continued to salt the earth with it.

81 posted on 03/03/2006 7:38:21 AM PST by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson