Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
I'm not sure how he (and Senate leadership) plan to play this.

Maybe it will become clearer when the players start to show up. I find it quite confusing, however. They had the two bills, went to conference and the Senate did not get its bill in its pure form. Now Specter offers amendments to take it back in the direction of the Senate form. How will the members of the House react to this?

194 posted on 03/06/2006 11:10:48 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; Txsleuth; tiredoflaundry; Mo1; OXENinFLA

What is Lott up to? Roberts is not liking what's going on.


195 posted on 03/06/2006 11:13:06 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

To: Bahbah; Cboldt

I am glad you guys are working on what Specter said...he was confusing me.


196 posted on 03/06/2006 11:13:30 AM PST by Txsleuth (Bush-Bot;WaterBucket Brigader;and fan of defconw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

To: Bahbah
I find it quite confusing, however. They had the two bills, went to conference and the Senate did not get its bill in its pure form. Now Specter offers amendments to take it back in the direction of the Senate form.

It was almost as though Specter was channeling Feingold. Weird.

I think the bill is meant to operate in the future, and not affect the passage that just took place. Window dressing perhaps.

198 posted on 03/06/2006 11:16:05 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson