Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Coverage -- (March '06)
Thomas ^ | 3-1-06 | US Congress

Posted on 03/01/2006 6:27:28 AM PST by OXENinFLA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,301-1,312 next last
To: defconw

Not all pubbies are bad .. though there are a number of them I'd like to kick in the rear right about now


481 posted on 03/09/2006 11:16:53 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Now here is my other question, what company in their right mind will want to buy this now vacated interest in these terminals?


482 posted on 03/09/2006 11:17:44 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I would never say that all pubbies are bad. I have not threatened to take my loyalty else where. I would like to smack a few people however. Nothing new there really.


483 posted on 03/09/2006 11:19:37 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: defconw
Now here is my other question, what company in their right mind will want to buy this now vacated interest in these terminals?

There are literally thousands of options. DPW creates wholly US-owned subsidiary - or one with controlling interest if not wholly US-owned. Individual operation could be sold off to business consortiums already in the business. Neighbors at various ports may have an interest, etc.

Whatever form the "new deal" takes need not resemble the proposed P&O -> DPW transfer.

484 posted on 03/09/2006 11:20:37 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: defconw
what company in their right mind will want to buy this now vacated interest in these terminals?

I think there are really a number of scenarios that could make this a very sweet deal for some company and I'm pretty sure that someone has been envisioning it in much more detail than I could come up with.

485 posted on 03/09/2006 11:22:44 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I think Rush goofed on his announcement that Dubai Ports will divest itself of American investments.

He just replayed Warner's statement, WORD FOR WORD. He can't make a mistake doing that.

486 posted on 03/09/2006 11:23:17 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thus making an already convoluted business arrangement even more convoluted. Well I guess that's the best that be done on it. It would have been nice if these "gentlemen" and I use the term loosely had thought of this two weeks ago.


487 posted on 03/09/2006 11:23:29 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
I think there are really a number of scenarios that could make this a very sweet deal for some company and I'm pretty sure that someone has been envisioning it in much more detail than I could come up with.

Limbaugh just played Warner's reading of the DPW press release, and it sounds as though DPW will have a hand in setting up a business structure of some sort. I don't see the interests being "sold" lock stock and barrel to some "American company" that already exists.

488 posted on 03/09/2006 11:25:40 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
If it turns our Harriet Miers buys the Port Leases I'll spit!

Now that is funny! Somebody a few posts up suggested Haliburton (Drink).
489 posted on 03/09/2006 11:27:04 AM PST by Republican Red ("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Oh TOL! To Funny!


490 posted on 03/09/2006 11:28:45 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; Bahbah; Mo1; defconw; Peach; OXENinFLA; tiredoflaundry; All

Fox says that a presser with Clinton, Schumer and Reid...re: the ports deal is going to be on shortly..

Let's see..."we should not rush into this deal"....after THEY rushed to get rid of the first deal...LOL


491 posted on 03/09/2006 11:28:57 AM PST by Txsleuth (Bush-Bot;WaterBucket Brigader;and fan of defconw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

"worm their way out of this corner"

Shall we have a pool on who will trample who to get to a microphone this evening?


492 posted on 03/09/2006 11:30:44 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

thanks for the heads up


493 posted on 03/09/2006 11:31:10 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I have popcorn but no booze! Sigh!


494 posted on 03/09/2006 11:31:34 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
it sounds as though DPW will have a hand in setting up a business structure of some sort.

Right. Schumer is hoping that it will be such that he can still demagogue it as Dubai having an ownership interest in the ports and thus risking our national security, but I know these people are not stupid and will figure out a way to set this up so as to deny him the opportunity, although he will do it anyway, which will make him look like a bigger putz.

495 posted on 03/09/2006 11:31:42 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

If Dubya and Karl did this on purpose, I will just spit!


496 posted on 03/09/2006 11:32:42 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Just by way of example, 100% of companies in Mexico MUST be Mexican owned and controlled. No problem for US companies to establish operations there that return profits to the US Corporation.


497 posted on 03/09/2006 11:33:24 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies]

To: defconw
If Dubya and Karl did this on purpose, I will just spit!

:)

498 posted on 03/09/2006 11:33:26 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Here we go! Frist first up to spin!


499 posted on 03/09/2006 11:35:12 AM PST by defconw (Proud Member of the Bucket Brigade! Yes I am a Bushbot, so what of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Just by way of example, 100% of companies in Mexico MUST be Mexican owned and controlled. No problem for US companies to establish operations there that return profits to the US Corporation.

Yes, all it does is make it a bit more complicated and a bit less profitable than it otherwise would have been. The corruption down there is, as an aside, just breathtaking.

500 posted on 03/09/2006 11:36:18 AM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,301-1,312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson