Posted on 02/27/2006 6:28:16 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
In Florida's U.S. Senate race, Democratic incumbent Sen. Bill Nelson leads U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris, his likely Republican challenger, 53 - 31 percent, similar to his lead in August 31, 2005, and November 15, 2005, Quinnipiac University polls. Republicans back Harris 62 - 22 percent, while Democrats back Nelson 82 - 7 percent and independent voters go with the Democrat 55 - 23 percent.
"U.S. Rep. Harris has gained no ground against Sen. Nelson, who has a lukewarm 49 - 20 percent approval rating for the third poll in a row," Brown said.
(Excerpt) Read more at quinnipiac.edu ...
bill1952, I just moved back to Texas from living in Florida. I know about FL politics, and voted in the past few elections in FL.
As recently as the 1960 elections, Democrats controlled all 22 seats in the 11 states that comprised the Old Confederacy. Republicans did not make their breakthrough until 1961 in Texas. John Tower, whom Democratic vice presidential candidate Lyndon B. Johnson defeated by 17 points in 1960 while also running to retain his Senate seat in case Richard Nixon beat John Kennedy, narrowly won a run-off election in May 1961 with 50.6 percent to capture the Senate seat vacated by LBJ.
Thus was the Democratic monopoly in the South broken. Three years later Strom Thurmond of South Carolina switched parties, becoming the second Republican senator in the South. Still, by controlling 20 of the 22 Southern seats after the 1964 elections, Democrats reached their largest Senate membership level (68) since 1939 (69). Never again would their majority be so large. For Republicans, Barry Goldwater's victories in five contiguous states in the Deep South (Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina) represented the silver lining in their 1964 election debacle.
However, even after Richard Nixon's massive re-election in 1972, when he won landslide victories throughout the South, the Republicans managed to control only seven Southern Senate seats. After the 1976 election, only five Southern Senate seats were held by Republicans. Four of the 12 Senate seats captured in 1980 with the help of Ronald Reagan's coattails included Alabama, Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. Following Ronald Reagan's 1984 re-election landslide, Republican-controlled Southern Senate seats totaled 10, still less than half. After Bill Clinton's 1996 re-election, in which Democrats suffered a net loss of two Senate seats as Republicans won Democratic seats in Alabama and the president's native Arkansas, the Republicans controlled 15 Southern Senate seats. By then, the South had become instrumental to the Republican Party's 55-seat majority.
During the 2002 and 2004 elections, the Republicans swept all nine open Southern Senate seats. Today, Republicans occupy 18 of the 22 seats of the Old Confederacy.
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20050619-111016-5632r.htm
Granted, this is not an open seat, but the macro shift is still in the GOP's favor. I'm not saying Ms. Harris will win, but to say she can't win (especially now that Jeb and Dubya are warming up to her) is really kinda silly.
Let's make a wager Bill...I'll buy you a six-pack and a big cigar if she wins. You agree to do the same for me if she loses...
But I'm bettin' if she loses you'll be first in line complaining "what a lousy campaign!" she ran.
But you said she can't win. Why would you place a bet on a certain outcome?
First, Florida tilts Republican.
Second, the Florida economy is in high gear (and has been for some time).
Third, Crist will be elected by Governor by 10 or more.
Therefore, fourth, Harris will not lose by 20.
BUT ... here's the big question ... how many Senate seats will be in play come September? IF we're defending in states like Ohio, Missouri and Tennessee (in addition to Pennsylvania), it's hard to see where we'll find the resources to be competitive in second-tier pick-up opportunities such as Florida.
On the other hand, if we're comfortably ahead in the states I've mentioned, then we'll not only fully-fund first-tier pick-up opportunities (Minnesota, Maryland and New Jersey), but also some of the second-tier states. In this more optimistic scenario, Harris has to close the gap sufficiently, relative to states like Washington and Wisconsin, to warrant a major infusion of resources during the home stretch.
Let's face it, we could be doing a lot better in Florida if Jeb Bush or Tommy Franks ran for Senator, or if Crist and Gallagher could get together and decide who would run for Governor and who would run for Senator. But, it now looks as though Harris will be our candidate, and we're going to have to make this work.
I'd save my energy to work for Republican candidates who are able to energize the base and attract the fence-sitters.
With Martinez, the polls were not very promising, but he was able to keep us focused on the victory, despite his rookie mistakes.
With Harris, it's different. Every time I discuss Harris with the local Republican heavy hitters, I don't sense any serious enthusiasm for her.
Btw, Nelson has been good in dealing with the business community. For instance, his staff goes to the bat in their favor all the time when businesses run into federal issues with federal agencies. He has also built strong relationships with local business leaders.
"One factor I have yet to see addressed in this argument over Harris' prospects for Nelson's seat is the following (addressed frequently by Zell Miller)"
Bill Nelson received over $20000 from Abramoff clients. In the top tier of Senators in that regard.
But one of those 2 seats that the Dems control is in Florida, and until Martinez won, the Dems controlled both Senate seats. Remember that Martinez won by a hair against someone he should have clobbered. What's really distressing is that the Dems have fielded such an eminently beatable candidate, and the GOP has failed to capitalize on it.
So because you hang out with defeatists and pessimists, you won't support Harris because she can't fire up the defeatists and pessimists. Fascinating approach!!
Like I said, you'll be first in line...
Sez who? You? The anti-cheerleader?
the GOP has failed to capitalize on it.
No, YOU insist on throwing a tantrum because things haven't gone according to your little plan, so now you and George will sit back and wait until it's all over - so you can either bitch and moan if she loses or hop on that ol' bandwagon if she wins.
But one of those 2 seats that the Dems control is in Florida, and until Martinez won, the Dems controlled both Senate seats.
Uh, I doubt you meant to, but thanks for emphasizing my point.
The release has 429 Dems (40%), 443 Pubbies (41%), and 204 indies/others (19%).
Here's a resource.
"I will not soon forget the Fox interview with her maybe six months back or so, when she made sure her, uh, assets were profiled during the interview by awkwardly turning sideways while talking about her candidacy."
I'm sorry I missed that. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.