Posted on 02/26/2006 8:25:29 AM PST by jraven
Moving toward a deal that could allow President Bush and congressional GOP leaders to save face and avert a prolonged confrontation, GOP officials said today that they were discussing the idea of having Dubai Ports World seek a new review of its acquisition of a British company's operation that runs several key U.S. ports.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King, confirmed in a phone interview early Saturday afternoon to TIME that officials were close to a deal involving the Congressional leadership, the White House and the Dubai company. The agreement would call for a 45-day CFIUS-plus investigation, King said, referring to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a Treasury Department-run interagency panel that probes proposed acquisitions in the U.S.
Although the Dubai deal had already been approved by CFIUS, "the rationale for reopening it is, once DP carved out the American ports from the rest of the contract it changed the nature of the agreement so it had to be reviewed again," says King, who had been among the leading GOP voices opposing the deal as first approved without the extra 45-day review process or briefing of Congress. King says will await final details before formally backing any such deal. King added "if we are going to hold back on legislation, I think there has to be continuous congressional review throughout the new CFIUS review.
If approved by all parties, the new deal would allow Bush to avert a GOP-driven bill to overturn the Dubai deal with enough votes to override Bush's threat of his first veto. Republican sources tell TIME that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee proposed the basic terms of a deal designed to give the White House a graceful way out, while also allaying the concerns of the many lawmakers in both parties who have said the deal could be a threat to our security. Under the Frist plan, the deal could stand a good chance of ultimately going through after the extended review. Frist aides apparently proposed the terms to representatives of the company and the White House late Friday. Neither has formally responded but both seemed interested in the idea, according to a Senate Republican aide. "This avoids a direct clash," the aide said. "It solves everyone's problem. The President doesn't have to cancel the deal or veto anything."
Under Frist's plan, the company would voluntarily separate U.S. ports from the rest of the deal for 45 days, allowing them to continue to operate as they do while the deal is re-vetted. That would allow a new review through the administration's Committee on Foreign Investments in the U.S. (CFIUS). Administration officials remain adamant that their first review was thorough and proper, so the face-saving element was crucial, according to one Capitol Hill negotiator. Frist is proposing that this time, CFIUS do the extra 45-day review that the law calls for in transactions where there are national security concerns. That provision was not triggered last time because administration officials had no remaining concerns at the end of the first review. This approach would eliminate the need for new legislation now, the Republican sources said.
LOL!
You know you're position is in trouble when all you have to fall back on are silly cartoons and emotional photographs...which have absolutely nothing to do with the issue.
yep.
Many FReepers have taken sides with the Bush administration on this deal that gives DPWorld/UAE a foothold in internal commercial operations of US ports of entry. From their endless rhetoric in support of this sweetheart deal, the pro-DPWorld/UAE contingent must now lie in bed with the dirty "jihadists" who helped sponsor 9-11, who gave cover to Bin Laden, who supported the Taliban-Al Qaeda for years and who gave refuge to terrorists.
As I said earlier on this thread, there is going to be an additional 45-day evaluation period while the critical aspects of this deal are fully reviewed. Also DPWorld said they will create an American "buffer" company that will actually run the commercial operations until May, during this interim period. At least some action is being taken in WashDC. Thankful for that. OTOH. Some people remain stuck on stupid. Its a way of life for them.
Frank Noland.....Buck Henry
Announcer.....Dan Aykroyd
Mrs. Noland.....Gilda Radner
[Frank Noland, loud, hard-hitting host of TV call-in talk show, sits in front of a white brick wall and addresses the camera.]
Frank Noland: Good evening. I'm Frank Noland. And this is "Talk Back"!
[Cut to the "Talk Back" logo, then pull back to reveal Frank Noland sitting beneath it at a table lined with ten black telephones. He smokes a cigarette as funky 1970s-era theme music and a tough-talking announcer set the scene.]
Announcer: Talk Back! Frank Noland talks to you, the public! You, the public, talk to Frank Noland! He listens! Talk back to Frank Noland and he'll talk back to you!
Frank Noland: Tonight's topic is "Federally Supported Municipal Bonds -- Yes or No?" I'm Frank Noland and I want you to talk to me about federally supported municipal bonds. Call me now at one of these toll-free numbers: Eight zero-zero, five-five-five, three-three-one-zero -- one-one, one-two, one-three, one-four, one-five, one-six, one-seven, one-eight and one-nine! [pause] That topic, once again: "Federally Supported Municipal Bonds -- Yes or No?" Call me now and let me know how you feel. Those numbers, once again, are: eight zero-zero, five-five-five, three-three-one-zero -- one-one, one-two, one-three, one-four, one-five, one-six, one-seven, one-eight and one-nine!
[a long pause, Frank takes a deep drag on his cigarette, the phones do not ring]
Yes, we're talking about federally supported municipal bonds! Say, is it a federal problem? Is it a state problem? Is it - is it a combination of federal and state problems? Is it YOUR problem? Is it OUR problem? Why don't you give me a ring and talk back to me, Frank Noland? The operators ARE standing by! [another long pause, Frank grabs a glass of water and takes a sip, he looks at the silent row of phones, looks uncomfortable] This ... is Frank Noland. And our first topic tonight is, and has been "Federally Supported Municipal Bonds -- Yes or No?" Hey! But that's not the only issue I'm prepared to talk about tonight. How 'bout this one? "Forced Busing -- Yes or No?" Huh? I'm sure you have as many things to say about forced busing as I do. I'm Frank Noland and I'm prepared to talk back to you! And those numbers, once again, are eight zero-zero, five-five-five, three-three-one-zero -- one-one, one-two, one-three, one-four, one-five, one-six, one-seven, one-eight and one-nine! And they're TOLL-FREE! Totally toll-free!
[another long pause, Frank takes another drag and impatiently taps his pack of cigarettes on the table]
Let's run over those burning issues once again, shall we? They are, one, "Federally Supported Municipal Bonds" and, two, "Forced Busing"! Remember, toll-free! Totally free! You pay nothing here. We pay for the entire call. [phone rings once, Frank reaches for phone] And here's our first on "Talk Back" right now!
[Frank puts his hand on the phone and freezes as he realizes that it has stopped ringing -- another pause, Frank lets go of the phone and puts his hand to his head - he's getting desperate]
Here's another issue that may interest you: "Soviet Communism -- Let's Give It a Chance"! I'll bet there are some of you who have opinions on this one. That's Soviet Communism here -- here and now! Here, in this country, in your own community. I guess there are plenty of good, red-blooded Americans out there who'll have a little something to say about that. And, if there are, and you want to talk back to me, Frank Noland, I'm prepared to talk back to you! Maybe you forgot to make a note of those numbers. The numbers again are eight zero-zero, five-five-five, three-three-one-zero -- one-one, one-two, one-three, one-four, one-five, one-six, one-seven, one-eight and one-nine. And I'm ready to talk back on these same topics: Federally Supported Municipal Bonds, Forced Busing, and "Soviet Communism Here and Now"! I, Frank Noland, am ready to talk back to you in support of spending federal funds to bus known Soviet Communists into your community now -- to teach your children and to live in your house, whether you like it or not! Now, if anyone has another position, and it's your right as an American to disagree, give me a call on one of these toll-free lines. Call me collect! I'll answer and I'll talk back to-- I'll talk. I--
[pause, Frank puts an unlit cigarette in his mouth, thinks for a moment, then leans forward intently]
How 'bout this? "Killing Puppies -- It Doesn't Bother Me" ... That's me, Frank Noland, and I LIKE dead puppies! Frankly, I'm totally in favor of using federally supported municipal bonds to pay for forced busing of Soviet Communists to come into your homes to kill your puppies! Give me a call, won't you? The lines are open. Tell ME what you think about it. [lights his cigarette, mumbles to himself] Dead, mangled puppies ... I like 'em ...
[starting to lose it]
Okay. While you're thinking about THOSE topics, here are a half a dozen others which I, Frank Noland, am personally in favor of. "Adolf Hitler -- Boy, Do We Need Him Now"! Huh? What about that? Hey, "Incest -- I Practice It, Why Don't You?" Give me a call. Talk to me about it. [A sympathetic woman enters and joins Frank] "No Toilets for the Blind"? Call me! Call me, if you're watching! And, and--
Mrs. Noland: Frank? Frank, honey?
Frank Noland: "The Ozone Layer -- Let's Get Rid of It"!
Mrs. Noland: Frank, honey. Honey, let's go home.
Frank Noland: How 'bout "Suicide -- Fun for the Elderly"? [The sympathetic woman gently guides Frank out of his chair and offscreen] I-- I-- What happened? Nobody called. I don't understand it. What about nuns? We could do something about nuns... [As they exit, funky theme music begins and we zoom in on the "Talk Back" logo.]
Announcer: Join us again tomorrow on "Talk Back"! Frank Noland talks to the public! You, the public, talk to Frank Noland! He listens on "Talk Back"!
[Dissolve to the applauding audience. A superimposition reads: COMING UP NEXT: NEW HOPE FOR THE TERMINALLY CURIOUS
Clearly any UAE residents coming to this country will be vetted by the US. If, for example, they've raised funds for Hamas in the local version of country clubs, obviously they'll be barred from entry. If their families have supported Hamas, even if they haven't, they'll likely be denied security clearances. I'm sure we're not changing the rules for the UAE. If we are, it's a grave error.
As to dealing with an Israeli company, it's amazing anyone would look to that as something unusual. They'll be running our ports. If they don't deal with Israeli shippers, we'll shut them down. Participating in the Arab boycott is a crime in this country. Simple following the laws isn't a particularly strong recomendation for anything.
You're just "awful." lol
RM, as we are witnessing....moral relativism-- it's not just exclusive to the left. Some are even making light of those pictures, it's sick and wrong. Perhaps some are anti-semitic.
Who knows...
LOL! Where did you get that?
Sheesh
Oh, that's right...that lie was debunked.
Israel does buisness with the UAE as well..
Perhaps that's why the buchanan folks have actually turned on an Arab nation for once.
Your repeated attempts to stir the pot are tiresome. Now you're trying to throw anti-Semeticism into your witch's brew.
I'm still waiting for the photographs of an Arab eating a puppy...and American puppy.
Aren't we, in effect, giving money to Hamas too? Its not like they are using the money the world gives them to build schools and hospitals.
Probably the best way to get us out of this fight.
And the deal will probably still go through like it should.
If Hillary wants ignorant voters like yourself let her have them.
Ping me when it's posted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.