Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
And you are also of course ignoring the difficulty that subsistence cultures have in keeping the group fed and alive. Why on earth they would want to pull a Neanderthal woman into the group is a mystery to me.

Stone-age American Indians did this all the time. If 1000 Swedish women were dropped into a primitive tribal area, their DNA lines would not be lost. Simply put, I am saying that humans must have avoided interbreeding with Neanderthals for reasons that are much stronger than human-human activity indicates, or we would have some DNA trace of them. I'm not counting being furry, violently anti-social (like a wild animal), or such as "normal social exclusion". If you are, then we've reached a conclusion of our discussion.

176 posted on 02/25/2006 8:25:00 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

What if the 1000 Swedish women were butt ugly, vicious, and more muscle-bound than the Stone Age Indian guys? What do you think would happen then?


177 posted on 02/25/2006 8:27:24 AM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
I don't understand the discussion. Is there evidence, that the russians do not love their children?

Humans are of the group, that have few children and invest their lives in them.

Would not neanderthal do the same?

187 posted on 02/25/2006 8:38:38 AM PST by patton (Just because you don't understand it, does not mean that it does not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson