Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After a few days of fact finding and debate, do you now support or oppose the Dubai Ports deal?
FR Poll ^

Posted on 02/24/2006 12:20:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson

FR Poll: After a few days of fact finding and debate, do you now support or oppose the Dubai Ports deal?

Support

Oppose

Undecided


TOPICS: Announcements; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dubai; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541 next last
To: Arizona

Support


281 posted on 02/24/2006 2:28:16 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Support.


282 posted on 02/24/2006 2:29:17 PM PST by Right-Wing Champion (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Oppose

Big Time

Bush really painted himself into a corner with this one.


283 posted on 02/24/2006 2:30:50 PM PST by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

ditto


284 posted on 02/24/2006 2:31:38 PM PST by birbear (You know what? This is crap. We're going to stop this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: narby

----We must change the culture over there, and this is one of many ways to do it.----

Ironically, that's exactly what they've probably figured concerning us.

-Dan

285 posted on 02/24/2006 2:32:30 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1050.html

SAFETY AND SECURITY: Americans in the United Arab Emirates should exercise a high level of security awareness. The Department of State remains concerned about the possibility of terrorist attacks against U.S. citizens and interests throughout the world. Americans should maintain a low profile, vary routes and times for all required travel, and treat mail and packages from unfamiliar sources with caution. In addition, U.S. citizens are urged to avoid contact with any suspicious, unfamiliar objects, and to report the presence of the objects to local authorities. Vehicles should not be left unattended, if at all possible, and should be kept locked at all times. U.S. Government personnel overseas have been advised to take the same precautions. In addition, U.S. Government facilities may temporarily close or suspend public services from time to time as necessary to review their security posture and ensure its adequacy.


286 posted on 02/24/2006 2:34:06 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I was for the Port takeover before I decided I was against it.


287 posted on 02/24/2006 2:35:06 PM PST by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Oppose.

Use this as a springboard to get American companies back involved in port management in this country. Some things just shouldn't be outsourced (though I might consider outsourcing Congress).


288 posted on 02/24/2006 2:38:36 PM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

This warning applies to many countries, even ones in Europe, it pretty much is standard.


289 posted on 02/24/2006 2:38:55 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse; CharlesWayneCT

"Bush runs the country too much like a business, when it's more like a day care center."

That was a good one!!!

LLS


290 posted on 02/24/2006 2:40:54 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Agreed. The Chinese are not our friends either (look at their votes on the UNSC). Eventually, when they feel powerful and untouchable enough, they will contact us to say they are taking over Taiwan the next day - and what will we do then?

If Wal-mart were a nation, they'd be China's 5th largest trading partner (and this was a company that bragged about how many American jobs they saved by buying American). We are paying for their buildup in money, and we'll pay in more important ways later.

This country better wake up and build stronger relationships with our neighbors and people who don't actually hate us. Build a wall around the Arab nations and tell them if they want to pipe out oil, we'll airdrop food, otherwise they can stay in there and kill each other off while leaving the rest of us alone. In return, we won't draw any cartoons....


291 posted on 02/24/2006 2:40:55 PM PST by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
"...allowings Chuck "Chucky Cheese" Schumer to dictate how you think about a political subject."

That'll be the day. You'd better smile when you say that Mister.

292 posted on 02/24/2006 2:41:38 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Support.

I initially voted undecided, but came out for the UAE deal after I gave the issue a closer look.

293 posted on 02/24/2006 2:42:51 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker

Baloney! I was swayed by Krauthammer's original opinion that this should be unequivocally opposed. Even more so when I learned from a guest on Fox that the company also controls ports in other countries shipping TO the US. So then they would at least have knowledge of how security is handled on BOTH ends of a shipment, giving an embedded terrorist a good idea how to evade it.

Yes, I agree that Hillary and company are only opposing it because George Bush is vulnerable on the point. If a Democrat was president, they wouldn't have a problem one. But just because they're opposed doesn't make it a good idea (OK, most of the time it DOES, but not this time....)


294 posted on 02/24/2006 2:45:24 PM PST by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

I was opposed to the port takeover by the UAE before I was in support of it.


295 posted on 02/24/2006 2:47:25 PM PST by RichRepublican (Some days you're the windshield--some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
No nor do I think NNSBDD and the Navy should have yard work done their either. Where could the COLE bombers have learned so much about the COLE? If you want to know a ships weaknesses and construction the yards is the place to learn. I think it is also the height of Naval insanity to moor carriers there pier side. A carrier anchors off coast in foreign port for several reasons. Besides the obvious berthing considerations the main reason is you can get underway on ships screws & steering alone with no tugs or Pilot needed in less than 5 minutes likely sooner. I saw one do it pulling up anchor and deck houses while at the same time screws were being engaged and getting underway. We were out of port in a very short time.
296 posted on 02/24/2006 2:51:30 PM PST by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

SUPPORT


297 posted on 02/24/2006 2:52:33 PM PST by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Oppose


298 posted on 02/24/2006 2:52:50 PM PST by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Originally opposed, but now, on the basis of the evidence, SUPPORT.


299 posted on 02/24/2006 3:02:46 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sure the numbers are better than the first poll, BUT,,,,,if the "Ports" deal can ONLY generate 55% support here (based on an approximate 10% voting sample of likely FR voters--a probable representative FR sampling) from a group that is predominantly Republican and/or conservative--AND is well-read and knowledgable about the issue, much more than the average American--it highlights how bad this issue will play for the Republican Party nationally. It's a big loser for the President and Republicans nationally.


300 posted on 02/24/2006 3:08:39 PM PST by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson