Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B4Ranch

"Reducing the number of personnel doing security work and most certainly reduce the necessary qualifications for security personnel because all of these things which cost money will be their goals. Cut down the overhead costs will be a continual rant of the CFO's and lower executive managers. Let's increase annual bonuses by cutting overhead costs 10%. On and on."

Dude! They will have no say in security. Security, such as it is, will remain the same.


91 posted on 02/22/2006 9:18:04 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Nasty McPhilthy

You do not know squat about port security. Federal and state monies are given to the port authroity to conduct security. Most of what they have to do is mandated by law, but anything extra that is not mandated will only occur if the company decides they have the money to do it.

The company will know everything that enters or leaves thru the port. The company will also know the schedule of when security is at its highest, when it is at its lowest, when trackers are down for maintenence, when the CONEX box scanners are down for maintenence. We only check 5% of the CONEX boxes as it is.

That is more info than I want any foreign nation to know about a port that ships our military supplies thru it.


94 posted on 02/22/2006 9:26:45 PM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson