Kriskrinkle wrote: "I deny signing by any means any kind of contract or agreement with those blanket terms,..."
In response to which Shalom Israel started with: "There's nothing contractual about it, son."
Then at various times throughout the post wrote:
"Per the original contract,..."
"contracts entered..."
"By coming on my land with my permission, we entered a contract."
"If you breach the contract,..."
"If you didn't wish to accept the contract,..."
Aw, come on.
You start out saying "There's nothing contractual about it, son" then bring in the contractual aspect five different times.
Your post lacks internal consistency big time.
Do you really think you made a worthy response?
On the contrary. If I shoot you as a trespasser, that's an act of self-defense. Contracts have nothing to do with giving me the right of self-defense. That right is inalienable, and does not proceed from any human agreement or institution.
Back when you weren't a trespasser, a contract was what made your presence licit. That's what protected you from my fiery vengeance. When you breached the contract, the protection was removed, and you became a trespasser.
Being a trespasser, my right to self defense is back in force, and I plug you full of lead not because a contract says I can, but because it's my inalienable right as a property owner.