Then it isn't a contract. Thanks for admitting it.
You have a really hang up about Hobbes, even though no one here is defending him. Weird obsession.
Orwell was right about one thing: ignorance is strength. Since you know nothing about the theory of "social contracts," of course the name of the guy that invented it would mean nothing to you. Your ignorance makes you invincible.
Stark raving..
Once again, ignorance makes you invincible. Feel free to point out any error I may have made concerning the evolutionary history of humans.
Then it isn't a contract. Thanks for admitting it.
Do you ever tire of playing your juvenile word games izzy? -- I'm starting to wonder about how based on reality anything you post can be. You don't write like a math PhD who is concerned about religion, truth & credibility. -- And:
--- You have a really hang up about Hobbes, even though no one here is defending him. Weird obsession.
Orwell was right about one thing: ignorance is strength. Since you know nothing about the theory of "social contracts,"
Yet another in a long line of unsupported juvenile "yo momma" type comments.
of course the name of the guy that invented it would mean nothing to you.
I've read enough Hobbes to know I don't much agree with him. Why you obsess about him however, - escapes me.
Your ignorance makes you invincible.
Stark raving..
Once again, ignorance makes you invincible. Feel free to point out any error I may have made concerning the evolutionary history of humans.
I was commenting on your weird bit about gerbils, izzy. Read much?
tpaine wrote: Our Constiututions contract doesn't need signing.
Shalom Israel wrote: Then it isn't a contract. Thanks for admitting it
kriskrinkle writes: If our Constitutions contract doesn't need signing and therefore is not a contract for that reason, then neither an implied contract or an adhesive contract are contracts because they don't need signing.