Skip to comments.
Chertoff Defends Review of Ports Takeover
Yahoo News ^
| FEB.19, 2006
| WILL LESTER
Posted on 02/19/2006 8:44:08 AM PST by radar101
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Another strike against Republicans and Bush. "Oh, yeah--we are fighting terrorists" Our military is, but the Administration is giving away the country.
1
posted on
02/19/2006 8:44:09 AM PST
by
radar101
To: radar101
Chertoff is bad news in every way, all along.....the only question I have is which pipers tune does he dance to?
To: radar101
Chertnoff is once again wrong. Either he is clueless or . . .
3
posted on
02/19/2006 8:49:42 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: radar101
Another unnecessary, self inflicted black eye.
4
posted on
02/19/2006 8:49:57 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: radar101
5
posted on
02/19/2006 8:51:15 AM PST
by
Modok
To: raybbr; DTogo; AZ_Cowboy; Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; ...
6
posted on
02/19/2006 8:52:05 AM PST
by
Stellar Dendrite
(There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Isn't Chertoff a clinton hold over?
7
posted on
02/19/2006 8:52:38 AM PST
by
LucyT
(It's 72 white grapes; it never was 72 virgins: http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=7)
To: radar101
"Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff on Sunday defended the government's security review of an Arab company given permission to take over operations at six major U.S. ports."
Hmmmm, Mr. Chertoff...I say, hmmmm, Mr. Chertoff...I SAY, HMMMM MR. CHERTOFF...
To: radar101
"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."
9
posted on
02/19/2006 8:53:07 AM PST
by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
To: ncountylee
This is going to be a PR disaster for the Republicans if this deal is not quashed ASAP. The Dems will use it to claim they are stronger on anti-terrorism than the GOP.
This is a BAD move for the GOP. What are they thinking?
To: radar101
This entire situation is the breaking point for me.
The border situation is bad enough but this is the payoff.
Bush et al should be ashamed of themselves.
11
posted on
02/19/2006 8:53:47 AM PST
by
Mears
(The Killer Queen-caviar and cigarettes.)
To: radar101
Chertoff is so far....unimpressive.
I am trying to be polite here.
12
posted on
02/19/2006 8:54:14 AM PST
by
trubluolyguy
(Islam, Religion of Peace and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: radar101
While I am no fan of the buyer of this 'port' business, seems that port security is already run by foreigners. I do not recall Congress whelping about security before now.
To: radar101
14
posted on
02/19/2006 8:55:30 AM PST
by
Lobbyist
(I want my American dream!)
To: LucyT
No, in fact he was Repub counsel to one of the Commitees that investigated the klintons.....whitewater, etc, I think.
To: Bobkk47
16
posted on
02/19/2006 8:57:26 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: LucyT
Isn't Chertoff a clinton hold over?
Can't blame him on Clinton, when he's in a position that didn't exist back then.
17
posted on
02/19/2006 8:57:37 AM PST
by
kenth
To: radar101
"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."
This from the guy who denies Mexican military excursions into the US by saying they were lost after crossing the Rio Grande....our borders are a sieve....yeah I trust him/not......
18
posted on
02/19/2006 8:59:08 AM PST
by
rolling_stone
(Question Authority!)
To: Bobkk47
This is a BAD move for the GOP. What are they thinking?
Obviously they are thinking $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
19
posted on
02/19/2006 8:59:20 AM PST
by
BubbaTheRocketScientist
(We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
To: radar101
Well, they will only be doing the terrorism that Americans won't do.
Can anyone imagine, you can't be a mentally disordered globalist however, inviting an enemy, sworn to kill you, your wife, your children and destroy the US Constitution, sit down at you table for dinner, and then give him a room to live in your home? GWB has lost his mind. His version of amnesty for criminal aliens and his reluctance to defend our borders announced it first, and now this proves it.
I actually think the very liberal Democrats have something, that he must be impeached, but not for be anti-liberal but only for being an enemy within.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson