Dude, that's BS.
No, it's a description of the exchange.
I asked him directly if he misrepresented the ages of the skins vis-a-vis the bones, and he said no, he just referred to a misrepresentation made by someone else.
Where and when was this?
To date, whenever it has been brought up, Havoc has failed to even admit that Hovind's claim was in error, unless I've managed to miss a critical post. As recently as two months ago (the original exchange was over a year ago), he blustered and tried to change the subject when reminded of the falsehood, without admitting error on his or Hovind's part.
I hope you're not chasing down anyone who commits a faux paux and never letting them forget it.
No, I'm pointing out when an anti-evolutionist is unable to admit even the most obvious of his own errors, or the errors of another anti-evolutionist, and how he *repeats* the false claim even after it has been demonstrated to him that it is false.
That's not science either!!!!
I didn't say it was. It was an examination of someone's abysmal inability to be accurate or honest.